• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 147 148 149 150 151 … 547 Next »
New cloak idea

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Do you approve of this idea?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
I like.
74.65%
53 74.65%
I don't like.
18.31%
13 18.31%
Other.
7.04%
5 7.04%
Total 71 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (9): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »
New cloak idea
Offline Talesin
02-07-2013, 06:06 PM,
#11
Member
Posts: 748
Threads: 31
Joined: Jan 2010

(02-07-2013, 05:57 PM)McTemka Wrote: [...] weaken heavy ships [...] what point to use it? [...]. what point?

(02-07-2013, 04:29 PM)Amon.Cire Wrote: would be a smuggler / trader's dream!
(02-07-2013, 04:12 PM)Narcotic Wrote: Such device would give ambuscades, smuggling runs, trading, piracy, recon/escort missions, explorations and other stuff a totally new meaning.

That. Not everyone is using cloaks on BSes only.

I think it might be a nice idea, however it also makes small ships undetectable at even low range.
A freighter using it would hardle be able to be seen above 3k, and almost every ship can simply vanish inside of gas clowds due to the limited sight range.

Overall i like the idea though.


Regards,
Talesin
  Reply  
Offline Narcotic
02-07-2013, 06:13 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 3,407
Threads: 151
Joined: Oct 2010

(02-07-2013, 05:57 PM)McTemka Wrote: This is not great idea, since you weaken heavy ships this way. If ship remain 50% visible, what point to use it? For sudden attacks even current type will work. But for retreating this one will be just a waste, since you are still visible, can't cruise away, can't shoot... what point?

Of course it has disadvantages. Otherwise it wouldn't be balanced. Heavy ships could use it for sneaking into areas where they can do heavy damage. Of course it'd make more sense to use the current cloak, when trying to retreat out of a battle while being in CD range. But it costs fuel, which is limited.

Besides, as the current cloak is supereffective on caps, it rather sucks on snubs/gunboats. This one might be an option for them to have "stealth devices", too. And I'd like to repeat, that it's not about a substitute, but an alternative cloak.

The main advantage is that it wouldn't consume fuel. So yes, regarding caps, it'd probably only make sense on CAU8 Carriers with docking modules and stuff. Or cruisers with a small cargo hold.

[Image: Narcotic.gif]

Lee's Logs | Lee's Diary | Nat's Story | AI Shodan | Rogue Clyde | Braun's Logs | The Narcotic | The Pandora | Biographies | Feedback
  Reply  
Offline shad0ws
02-07-2013, 06:14 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-07-2013, 06:16 PM by shad0ws.)
#13
Member
Posts: 22
Threads: 1
Joined: Apr 2012

Good idea especially if you can use it while thrusting, would make the cheetah thruster worth while for the amount it costs.

Although this could also enable pvp abuse as you cannot see the id.
Reply  
Offline Knjaz
02-07-2013, 06:36 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-07-2013, 07:48 PM by Knjaz.)
#14
Member
Posts: 1,648
Threads: 80
Joined: Dec 2010

(02-07-2013, 04:51 PM)Narcotic Wrote: Capitals can also use it for raids, when they're trying to push forward into foreign space without being recognized on scanners. (For example Rheinland fleets proceeding to Planet Hudson. Or after a withdrawal into nebulaes/asteroid fields.

There can be found a use for every vessel actually. (However, since it doesn't need fuel, the device should take more cargo to mount.

As one of (now inactive) RNC fleetcoms in raids, I'd never give up proper cloak for that equivalent. Then again, that applies to the RNC raids, where turtles have to get close to dreads to have a chance hitting them. And they also should do so with their energy fully regenerated.

Also, the lack of cruise/thruster + powerdrain makes them barely useful for combat in general, unless in Nebulas. So if you want to make it useful for combat situations - one of these has to go. (EDIT: This is related to caps, mainly)
Reply  
Offline Eduard
02-07-2013, 06:55 PM,
#15
Member
Posts: 1,102
Threads: 123
Joined: Dec 2011

(02-07-2013, 05:57 PM)McTemka Wrote: This is not great idea, since you weaken heavy ships this way. If ship remain 50% visible, what point to use it? For sudden attacks even current type will work. But for retreating this one will be just a waste, since you are still visible, can't cruise away, can't shoot... what point?

The point is ambushing a group or avoiding encounters instead of running from them. It offers a similar yet at the same time different approach from the normal cloak

As much as I like this idea, I have a fear it will be spammed over and over and everyone will be using it to escape any kind of encounter so they would achieve their interest meaning reduced RP as well as pew pew

(08-10-2015, 07:03 PM)Antonio- Wrote: King Eduard is the greatest
Reply  
Offline Othienka
02-07-2013, 06:57 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-07-2013, 06:58 PM by Othienka.)
#16
Member
Posts: 207
Threads: 11
Joined: Dec 2010

(02-07-2013, 06:36 PM)Knjaz Wrote: Also, the lack of cruise/thruster + powerdrain makes them barely useful for combat in general, unless in Nebulas. So if you want to make it useful for combat situations - one of these has to go.

Well, according to the original description, they aren't supposed to be useful in actual combat.

Regarding the idea, I like it, although I would prefer this to be limited to snubs/gunboats and smugglers.
Reply  
Offline Omicron
02-07-2013, 06:58 PM,
#17
The Order
Posts: 4,745
Threads: 386
Joined: Nov 2009

Just thought of incredibly "fun" idea.

Snubs equipped with this stealth drive in nebulas and 'roid fields.

[Image: E9d8RnV.jpg?1]
Reply  
Offline Landers
02-07-2013, 07:12 PM,
#18
Member
Posts: 609
Threads: 43
Joined: Jul 2010

Excellent equipment for intelligence organizations.
Reply  
Offline Felix_Wannamaker_III
02-07-2013, 07:47 PM,
#19
Member
Posts: 143
Threads: 8
Joined: Mar 2012

Shut up and take my money. Give it cruisedrain-like properties to prevent ID fraud

Also, consider a substitute for Armor as a 'slot" (read stealth armor) Only double hull (so very sub par) costs cargo and lots of cash, and comes in various sizes for various holds.

I love this for pirates. Sit on a lane, and they cant see you to break off early. Surprise!

A smuggler immune to tlagsnet and difficult to intercept. YES!

Intel gathering just off plane, invisible to enemy scanners.

Approach combat with it on, maximize surprise and tactical flexibility.
Also to disengage when a fight is already on

Combat in nebulae becomes a deadly game of hide-and seek.
I can see you Kirk! Can you see me?


Useful, but dangerous to use, everywhere. Trade vulnerability for stealth is a pretty fair exchange.

Im penniless, rotten in a fight, and have authority issues, but im back!
Reply  
Offline Knjaz
02-07-2013, 07:51 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-07-2013, 07:53 PM by Knjaz.)
#20
Member
Posts: 1,648
Threads: 80
Joined: Dec 2010

(02-07-2013, 07:47 PM)Felix_Wannamaker_III Wrote: I love this for pirates. Sit on a lane, and they cant see you to break off early. Surprise!

Won't do, due to powerdrain. You just won't be able to disrupt the TL in time.

Camping JG's or JHs in asteroid fields, with these, is a different question...
Reply  
Pages (9): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode