• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 34 35 36 37 38 … 198 Next »
Abuse of Power Complaint to Admins Via Bretonian War Cabinet/BAF

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (31): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 31 Next »
Thread Closed 
Abuse of Power Complaint to Admins Via Bretonian War Cabinet/BAF
Offline Thyrzul
05-31-2013, 10:08 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-31-2013, 10:08 PM by Thyrzul.)
#31
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(05-31-2013, 10:00 PM)jonnaffen747 Wrote: I didn't tested on Players, I was goin to Switch to my bomber that isn't tagged on that base to see how platforms doing. Then you jumped in.
Yeah, sure... twice... not too plausible excuse. Try an other tale.

Besides, why was it BHG IFF-d when the main authorial force of Bretonia is the BPA), main military force is the BAF|. Who else would have the authority to have control over such a bottleneck the New London Gate in Manchester is?

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
jonnaffen747
05-31-2013, 10:09 PM,
#32
Unregistered
 

(05-31-2013, 10:00 PM)jonnaffen747 Wrote: [20:47:37] SummerMcLovin: It's not against John personally - I was willing to let him get quite far with all this base stuff but as I said - it was getting a problem. It didn't look like trolling for sure, generally you seem nice enough not to bother with that. But just the past couple of days with all the base mess, I acted as I did. Yes it was abusive, but that is a pretty major route (especially for new players) and if I can't trust in the word and actions of those who run the base then there will be further mess.
jonnaffen747
05-31-2013, 10:10 PM,
#33
Unregistered
 

(05-31-2013, 10:08 PM)Thyrzul Wrote:
(05-31-2013, 10:00 PM)jonnaffen747 Wrote: I didn't tested on Players, I was goin to Switch to my bomber that isn't tagged on that base to see how platforms doing. Then you jumped in.
Yeah, sure... twice... not too plausible excuse. Try an other tale.

Besides, why was it BHG IFF-d when the main authorial force of Bretonia is the BPA), main military force is the BAF|. Who else would have the authority to have control over such a bottleneck the New London Gate in Manchester is?

As it was Defending gate, Summer had a 2ndary Password that he abused to kill the base ooRP no RP Post was made before base gone blown up no warning to me nothing.....
Offline Havok
05-31-2013, 10:12 PM,
#34
Member
Posts: 1,736
Threads: 111
Joined: Oct 2011

(05-31-2013, 10:10 PM)jonnaffen747 Wrote: As it was Defending gate, Summer had a 2ndary Password that he abused to kill the base ooRP no RP Post was made before base gone blown up no warning to me nothing.....

So You're basically saying you gave him secondary authority over the base to do what he likes.

[Image: ADc1VG0.png]
Here we are, don’t turn away now – we are the warriors that built this town.
The Discovery Database for Beginners - The Beginners Guide to Discovery - My Feedback Thread
 
Offline Karst
05-31-2013, 10:15 PM,
#35
Chariot of Light
Posts: 2,992
Threads: 214
Joined: Sep 2009

I'm not going to comment on the matter of abuse.

But I feel like commenting on the general subject of heavily weaponized bases guarding jump gates.
They disrupt gameplay by preventing pirates from operating in the area.

Look at Falster, or King's Cross. Those places completely eliminated activity in the respective areas, aside from passing traders.

Abuse or not, I'm glad it's gone. We've already got too many bases like that.

As I side note, one of the weapon platforms was annoyingly in the way between the lane and gate.
Was going to make a complaint thread about that in the comm channel, but that's obviously redundant now.

[Image: jWv1kDa.png]
Offline SMGSterlin
05-31-2013, 10:17 PM,
#36
Member
Posts: 2,207
Threads: 81
Joined: Feb 2010

Looks like your base was shooting traders, BPA took offence to that, and did what any normal police/military would do. Destroy it.


Just seems like you're crying because you didn't get chance to save it, and you're pulling the "abuse card".


Deal with it and go build your base again, this time make sure you don't piss off the BPA.

[Image: smgsterlin.gif]
jonnaffen747
05-31-2013, 10:18 PM,
#37
Unregistered
 

(05-31-2013, 10:12 PM)Ndk071 Wrote:
(05-31-2013, 10:10 PM)jonnaffen747 Wrote: As it was Defending gate, Summer had a 2ndary Password that he abused to kill the base ooRP no RP Post was made before base gone blown up no warning to me nothing.....

So You're basically saying you gave him secondary authority over the base to do what he likes.

No, I don't wanted I had to, it was a Term for the base from BPA cuz it guards the gate they wanted to have some controles over it. I dont wanted it but I couldn't say no.
Offline Bootsiuv
05-31-2013, 10:18 PM,
#38
Member
Posts: 637
Threads: 20
Joined: Oct 2010

(05-31-2013, 10:12 PM)Ndk071 Wrote:
(05-31-2013, 10:10 PM)jonnaffen747 Wrote: As it was Defending gate, Summer had a 2ndary Password that he abused to kill the base ooRP no RP Post was made before base gone blown up no warning to me nothing.....

So You're basically saying you gave him secondary authority over the base to do what he likes.

And your implying having a secondary password gives someone the authority to destroy something which doesn't belong to them?

The lack of rp on this server recently is crazu. Everyone runs around screaming "be rp, be rp" but what they should be saying is "be rp when it's a good outcome for your character/faction, otherwise just pretend you didn't hear it".

RP or no, these are real people who have invested time and energy into something. Just blowing it up without warning goes against the spirit of what we're trying to do here....

Have fun.
jonnaffen747
05-31-2013, 10:20 PM,
#39
Unregistered
 

(05-31-2013, 10:18 PM)Bootsiuv Wrote:
(05-31-2013, 10:12 PM)Ndk071 Wrote:
(05-31-2013, 10:10 PM)jonnaffen747 Wrote: As it was Defending gate, Summer had a 2ndary Password that he abused to kill the base ooRP no RP Post was made before base gone blown up no warning to me nothing.....

So You're basically saying you gave him secondary authority over the base to do what he likes.

And your implying having a secondary password gives someone the authority to destroy something which doesn't belong to them?

The lack of rp on this server recently is crazu. Everyone runs around screaming "be rp, be rp" but what they should be saying is "be rp when it's a good outcome for your character/faction, otherwise just pretend you didn't hear it".

RP or no, these are real people who have invested time and energy into something. Just blowing it up without warning goes against the spirit of what we're trying to do here....

Have fun.

Thank you for that Statement, the pass was just given becuz of the RP Agreement abusing it ooRP hmm....
Offline Thyrzul
05-31-2013, 10:21 PM,
#40
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(05-31-2013, 10:10 PM)jonnaffen747 Wrote: As it was Defending gate, Summer had a 2ndary Password that he abused to kill the base ooRP no RP Post was made before base gone blown up no warning to me nothing.....

There was roleplay going on about it prior and after destruction, just because Blackpool industries were not notified beforehand about the complete removal of the base, that doesn't mean the whole was ooRP. Besides, you gave access to him, you obviously knew what he can do with that.

But of course I don't want to outright defend him, just stating my opinion about the points you raised up in the post I quoted from you. He can of course defend himself anytime he decides to do so, he won't need me for that.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Pages (31): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 31 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode