• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Official Player Factions Inter-House .:j:. Archives
1 2 3 4 5 Next »
.:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (42): « Previous 1 … 18 19 20 21 22 … 42 Next »
.:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback
Offline Pancakes
01-09-2014, 05:40 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-09-2014, 05:50 PM by Pancakes.)
#191
Member
Posts: 3,395
Threads: 151
Joined: Jul 2010

(01-09-2014, 05:31 PM)Independent Miners Guild Wrote:
Quote:Reasons: Leeds has fallen into Gallic control. The base is no longer viable as a fuel depot as Mox cannot be obtained at LD14 anymore. Now the station will serve as a last line of defense against the invading Gallic horde. The location was decided because of the close proximity Leeds jh is to Trafalgar located in NL. Junkers trying to defend the back door from its enemy.

Please... not another senseless blocking base.
If there is a base covering that hole, it should be BAF-IFFed.
Definitely there should not be a ragtag Junker base guarding a House system.
That makes zero sense irply (at least for me) and it is also harmful for gameplay, as every blocking base it.

//sorry, wrong account. It's Jack, obviously.

sorry but, gotta agree on that.

EDIT: Moreover since blocking a jump hole wasn't it's original intention. The whole purpose of the relocation is to allow PoBs to maintain their older usage. For example moving it back into a mining field that was changed, or moving it to a jump hole when that Jump hole was relocated and the base has been previously blocking it.

Not that I agree with JH blocking PoBs, but if that was its original intention I could at least understand why you want it to be relocated.

[Image: p2SKLap.jpg?1]
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD
Reply  
Offline Highland Laddie
01-09-2014, 05:44 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-09-2014, 05:45 PM by Highland Laddie.)
#192
Member
Posts: 2,082
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2013

Quote:Please... not another senseless blocking base.

AGREED! Please...this is one of the major reasons the haters hate PoBs. Heck, I'm a big PoB proponent, and I HATE jumphole-blocking PoBs. Don't be part of the problem, please.
Reply  
Offline Hawk
01-09-2014, 05:55 PM,
#193
Ass Kickin Meanie
Posts: 2,637
Threads: 522
Joined: Jul 2008

You can all stop, because it was decided more than a day ago that this base will NOT be blocking a jumphole.


Reply  
Offline Omi
01-09-2014, 05:56 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-09-2014, 05:58 PM by Omi.)
#194
By Unpopular Demand
Posts: 1,716
Threads: 87
Joined: Aug 2007

(01-09-2014, 04:57 PM)JunkerTown Wrote: Perhaps you have a better suggestion on where we should move it?

Come up with something a little less arsey than "we want to completely block the New London jumphole with zero chance for anyone to provide any sort of counterplay" - totally contrary to the normal process of setting a base up.

(01-09-2014, 04:03 AM)JunkerTown Wrote: I am shocked a GRN would be opposed to this move!!!
Just think of all the fun we could all have pewing each other in Leeds.

Yes, I can already imagine all the "fun" that having your core-4, platformed PoB on top of the New London hole would provide.

Truly, the idea of the LNS, BAF and god-knows-what-else cap fleets taking cover behind a Congress base bristling with weapons platforms barely 40k from Leeds fills me with a joyful anticipation.

Also, the suggestion that .:j:. would ever do any sort of "pewing" is laughable, given that I don't count silent 4am server time powertrading as falling under that particular term.

I was against Coin's little reign of terror over Dublin from the beginning, and I'm sure as hell not going to let a Junker version pop up to put a further stake through the heart of Bretonia's activity levels.

EDIT: Got ninja'd by Hawk. Good to hear, though. Pitchfork down for now, then.

[Image: omicega.gif]
Reply  
Offline Junker Congress
01-09-2014, 07:22 PM,
#195
Member
Posts: 616
Threads: 110
Joined: May 2008

(01-09-2014, 05:31 PM)Independent Miners Guild Wrote:
Quote:Reasons: Leeds has fallen into Gallic control. The base is no longer viable as a fuel depot as Mox cannot be obtained at LD14 anymore. Now the station will serve as a last line of defense against the invading Gallic horde. The location was decided because of the close proximity Leeds jh is to Trafalgar located in NL. Junkers trying to defend the back door from its enemy.

Please... not another senseless blocking base.
If there is a base covering that hole, it should be BAF-IFFed.
Definitely there should not be a ragtag Junker base guarding a House system.
That makes zero sense irply (at least for me) and it is also harmful for gameplay, as every blocking base it.

//sorry, wrong account. It's Jack, obviously.

Funny enough were working with BAF and they have full access.

.:j:. Faction Information .:j:. Message Dump .:j:. Recruitment .:j:. Feedback .:j:.
  Reply  
Offline NOVA-5
01-09-2014, 08:42 PM,
#196
Smegger
Posts: 1,389
Threads: 63
Joined: Jan 2009

Calm down there, you'll have a heart attack going on like that son,
coming in here shouting the odds about Admins giving help to struggling
Pobs & cheeky Junker one off requests, you'll give yourself a hernia!

I never really thought the base would be moved in the first place; never
mind within a jh, the base lies dead down there & has for a good while,
the BAF & BPA) were marked up there before Congress got it & still are
as it's a legal Bretonian base, the last hold in Leeds. It was to let it go
or bring her up & have a go at it for Bretonia's sake & Yarr it up a bit.

Pob's are boring as hell i know, we've a few! but we've got a little gem there
in our control named Rayburn Station with some potential action for more than
just us, we're not looking to do anyone over, just enjoy the base for a change
& feel more comfortable with it.
This base may give the Stiff Little Fingers up to the Gauls but good, we'll try
to enjoy it as long as it lasts. Up the Peacocks!
Reply  
Offline Haste
01-10-2014, 01:24 PM,
#197
Lead Developer
Posts: 3,565
Threads: 107
Joined: May 2012
Staff roles:
Balance Dev

You built a now invincible base far from where anyone would ever look, free of the risks that come with building in a "high-profile" location. Now you want it moved somewhere it isn't absolutely useless, but without giving your enemies a chance to do anything about it.

Even if it doesn't become a jumphole blocker, I don't see why it would be moved.

Last time you tried to build closer to civilization, it wasn't so easy after all.

[Image: cdSeFev.png]
Reply  
Offline Junker Congress
01-10-2014, 10:19 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-10-2014, 10:22 PM by Junker Congress.)
#198
Member
Posts: 616
Threads: 110
Joined: May 2008

One of our members tried to build there.

You haven't seen what were capable of when we build as a group.
Still I would like to just point out again...
This base has been here for years now far before any mention of the invasion.
We didn't change Leeds.
We adjusted the distance so it doesn't block the hole on our new move request.
The base was fine where it was before the DRASTIC change to Leeds.
Those voices in opposition just happen to be the same ones who would destroy the station if they could.
Anyway the request no longer puts the station on top of the hole but closer for us to maintain it.

.:j:. Faction Information .:j:. Message Dump .:j:. Recruitment .:j:. Feedback .:j:.
  Reply  
Offline NOVA-5
01-11-2014, 12:51 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-11-2014, 12:51 AM by NOVA-5.)
#199
Smegger
Posts: 1,389
Threads: 63
Joined: Jan 2009

(01-10-2014, 01:24 PM)Haste Wrote: I don't see why it would be moved.

You're in the wrong thread, you want the Admin feedback!

Funny how we didn't get this much feedback when someone tried
to set us up by building a Congress base to get folk to look for our
real one because they couldn't find it, not much sympathy for us
then or now & we're just moving a base like all the rest are.

Give me a minute till i go look at the rest of the feedback's everyone
got for requesting a move...

No, not a sausage & it only took 50 seconds!
Reply  
Offline Mímir
01-11-2014, 01:02 AM,
#200
Member
Posts: 2,823
Threads: 182
Joined: Dec 2010

you want your junker base to be the last bastion of leeds? in roleplay?

why not make it a smuggling freeport? perfect spot for joining gallic and sirian black and grey markets, with the war raging Gallics might be too busy for you if you don't make too much trouble and you could even roleplay with some of the Gallic quasi-lawfuls that have influence on gallic affairs. There'd be a common interest of sorts, maybe.

A de-facto militarized junker base is a missed opportunity no matter what.

[Image: 120px-BhgLogo.png][Image: 120px-LH_Logo.png]
Reply  
Pages (42): « Previous 1 … 18 19 20 21 22 … 42 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode