• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 25 26 27 28 29 … 46 Next »
Developer Notice: Player Owned Bases Update

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (18): « Previous 1 … 11 12 13 14 15 … 18 Next »
Developer Notice: Player Owned Bases Update
Offline Singularity
03-14-2014, 05:56 PM,
#121
Member
Posts: 768
Threads: 11
Joined: May 2013

(03-14-2014, 05:48 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: People seem to think that they should have the right to just lazily fill up their bases and then let them defend themselves. Not only are people forgetting weapons platforms but, surprisingly, they've forgotten that ACTUAL PLAYERS can defend bases too!
Who'd believe it?

Yes, thats the main point as stated above, why are people angry about core 4 bases when, the base's weapon platforms plus few defenders will easily wave away a battle-group.

Not that a Core 4 base is without weapons platforms and if it is without protection, then I am pretty sure its well defended through diplomacy for not having those platforms.

||| Ollie's way ||| Ship Dealer ||| Code & Equipment shop |||

[Image: 33267_s.gif]

Low: ||| IMG ||| GMG ||| Platinum ||| Punisher ||| Kruger ||| ALG ||| RS ||| Phoenix ||| 101st ||| BD ||| ODF ||| RHA ||| _Decent: ||| Ronin ||| DHC ||| NET ||| BAF|A |||
Reply  
Offline spacedragon
03-14-2014, 05:58 PM,
#122
Member
Posts: 52
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2013

(03-14-2014, 05:48 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: People seem to think that they should have the right to just lazily fill up their bases and then let them defend themselves. Not only are people forgetting weapons platforms but, surprisingly, they've forgotten that ACTUAL PLAYERS can defend bases too!
Who'd believe it?
...and even people who know all that things usually may not have 10 players who are online 24 hrs a day to protect one base. most people don't know exactly when an attack will take place and some people have to sleep sometimes.
Reply  
Offline SnakThree
03-14-2014, 06:09 PM,
#123
Member
Posts: 9,091
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

(03-14-2014, 05:58 PM)spacedragon Wrote:
(03-14-2014, 05:48 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: People seem to think that they should have the right to just lazily fill up their bases and then let them defend themselves. Not only are people forgetting weapons platforms but, surprisingly, they've forgotten that ACTUAL PLAYERS can defend bases too!
Who'd believe it?
...and even people who know all that things usually may not have 10 players who are online 24 hrs a day to protect one base. most people don't know exactly when an attack will take place and some people have to sleep sometimes.

There are no hostiles with 10 players who are online 24/7 to siege a base. Most attackers don't know if the defenders will show up and they have to sleep sometimes.

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
  Reply  
Online Lythrilux
03-14-2014, 06:09 PM,
#124
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,356
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

(03-14-2014, 05:58 PM)spacedragon Wrote:
(03-14-2014, 05:48 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: People seem to think that they should have the right to just lazily fill up their bases and then let them defend themselves. Not only are people forgetting weapons platforms but, surprisingly, they've forgotten that ACTUAL PLAYERS can defend bases too!
Who'd believe it?
...and even people who know all that things usually may not have 10 players who are online 24 hrs a day to protect one base. most people don't know exactly when an attack will take place and some people have to sleep sometimes.
  • You don't need to have 10 people nessecariliy, you can also use the weapons platforms against them
  • You don't need defenders on 24/7. I am sure that with these new times, you can easiliy get some people on to defend the base. Make an inRP comm or something hiring people to defend it.
  • SOME people have to sleep, not all. I'm sure that not 100% of Discos population shares the same bedtime.
  • You didn't know when the attack was coming before, it's spontaneous. If anything though, you at least have the grace of forum RP to alert you that people will be interested in kreiging your base.

To be honest, I just see a lot of Core 4 owners crying over spilt milk. Sure, it may have made a notable difference in base supplying, however bare-bones mechanics are in place so that a base can STILL be defended. Just because your xXMLG420ReinforcedAllyXx power-fortresses are no longer indestructible does not warrant that bases are a useless feature in the mod (even though I still believe it'd be better to ditch the PoB plugin, but oh well...).

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline Vipera Berus
03-14-2014, 07:47 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-14-2014, 07:49 PM by Vipera Berus.)
#125
Member
Posts: 332
Threads: 18
Joined: Sep 2009

Quite frankly loosing the PoB I have would annoy me but the net result would be to reduce the amount of time I have to waste supplying it.

Edit:Some days when reading the forums and seeing the standards of behaviour is enough for me to start thinking ok time to stop playing Freelancer.
Reply  
Offline Ponge
03-14-2014, 09:02 PM,
#126
Member
Posts: 1,266
Threads: 103
Joined: Feb 2013

I'm not familiar with this "calculate siege time, base damage, cerb damage, etc" stuff, so cannot do the math peoperly. What would happen if the shield damage absorbtion would be 98% instead of 97%? How would siege time be different?

[Image: 2whqqh0.png]
Reply  
Offline Kazinsal
03-14-2014, 09:16 PM,
#127
Wizard
Posts: 4,541
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2009

(03-14-2014, 09:02 PM)Ponge Wrote: I'm not familiar with this "calculate siege time, base damage, cerb damage, etc" stuff, so cannot do the math peoperly. What would happen if the shield damage absorbtion would be 98% instead of 97%? How would siege time be different?

Dramatic increase in number of battleships required.

Fun fact: just tried figuring out with said formula how many cerberus cannons would break even with a shielded stocked core 1. Ten cerberus cannons caused a division by zero.

Retired, permanently.
Reply  
Offline nOmnomnOm
03-14-2014, 09:18 PM,
#128
Probation
Posts: 5,914
Threads: 247
Joined: May 2011

(03-14-2014, 05:56 PM)Singularity Wrote:
(03-14-2014, 05:48 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: People seem to think that they should have the right to just lazily fill up their bases and then let them defend themselves. Not only are people forgetting weapons platforms but, surprisingly, they've forgotten that ACTUAL PLAYERS can defend bases too!
Who'd believe it?

Yes, thats the main point as stated above, why are people angry about core 4 bases when, the base's weapon platforms plus few defenders will easily wave away a battle-group.

Not that a Core 4 base is without weapons platforms and if it is without protection, then I am pretty sure its well defended through diplomacy for not having those platforms.

And if your base is in a system that is not usual y used and you look at the forums and see all these names at the system they you'd be pretty smart to log and see whats up and get your buddies down there too ready to defend the shiz.

[Image: zBEqQfl.jpg?1]
Reply  
Offline Treewyrm
03-14-2014, 09:19 PM,
#129
Alchemist
Posts: 2,084
Threads: 61
Joined: Jul 2007

So how many bases were blown upnailed since this announcement was finally nailedblown up on front page?
Reply  
Offline St.Denis
03-14-2014, 09:22 PM,
#130
Member
Posts: 100,607
Threads: 1,347
Joined: Dec 2011

(03-14-2014, 09:02 PM)Ponge Wrote: I'm not familiar with this "calculate siege time, base damage, cerb damage, etc" stuff, so cannot do the math peoperly. What would happen if the shield damage absorbtion would be 98% instead of 97%? How would siege time be different?

It would take 15 BSs with 3 Cerbs each 1hr 29 minutes to destroy a Level 4 Base, with shield and all 3 repair materials.

'I would like to be half as clever as some people like to believe they are'
Life is full of disappointments, it is how we handle them that helps to define us, as a person
Reply  
Pages (18): « Previous 1 … 11 12 13 14 15 … 18 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode