• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 127 128 129 130 131 … 779 Next »
The Truth about Zoners

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (10): « Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 Next »
The Truth about Zoners
Offline WesternPeregrine
05-28-2014, 12:25 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-28-2014, 12:27 PM by WesternPeregrine.)
#71
Kusari Vanguard
Posts: 2,311
Threads: 166
Joined: Oct 2013

(05-28-2014, 11:50 AM)Zen_Mechanics Wrote: Zoners were, and still are the number one faction used in Discovery ( by my read - and this might have changed in the last few months )

It might be semantics, but I believe Zoners are the number one ID used in terms of diversity, having 3 or 4 Factions that spawned from that ID and concept.
In terms of most used Faction, that would be the Junkers (in 2 groups) or the IMG (in a single group). Perhaps there is confusion between ID use, player faction influence, and the role of the NPC concept, and people don't know on which to rely on to guide them in the discussion of Zoners.

-------------------

I believe that in the question of the zoner capital line, they could be obtained by an organized zoner affiliated organization, like a player faction with the resources and bases to do so. However, I do not believe that the zoners (as in all with the ID) would be capable to build or obtain them, nor they would be entitled to own one just because there are caps with the name "Zoner" on them.

--------------

In another topic, I do not believe that Zoners (as in all zoner people, players and NPC) would be able to maintain their neutrality stance and policy, eased access to House and Border World systems, and at the same time hold territorial ambitions, such as colonizing planets or declaring a whole system under Zoner rule.
More feasible would be a zoner affiliated or zoner-friendly organization declaring a political independence. But then that zoner-affiliated faction (which doesn't represent the Zoners as a whole) can't claim the well known Zoner neutrality policy and backing. They would have to stand by themselves, stand by their ambitions and cause. The other zoner factions could set their stances towards this new "independent world/base faction", just like each of them does towards the Corsairs or the Outcasts. Do be aware that when such factions attain such identity, they cannot claim that they represent the Zoners or influence their relations, for they are not all of the Zoners, and many zoners are not like them.

[+]SIGNATURE
Kusari Former Mastermind
[Image: 5tZIDB3.jpg]
========================
| The Kusari Legal Codex |
| Character Profiles | The North Star Bulletin News|
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
05-28-2014, 12:32 PM,
#72
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,356
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

(05-28-2014, 12:18 PM)Snak3 Wrote: Solution to make capital ships less exploitable:

"Aquilon" Zoner Carrier - Cruiser Turrets, BS Shield.
"Nephilim" Zoner Mobile Colony Ship - Cruiser Turrets, BS Shield.
"Corvo" Zoner Deep Space Explorer - Gunboat Turrets, Cruiser Shield
Zoner "Fearless" Q-ship - Cruiser Turrets, Cruiser Shield.

Here. No longer are they heavy capital ships that can be rolled into a fight.

Cruiser and gunboat turrets can still ruin everything.
Transport turrets. No more, no less.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline Mercarryn
05-28-2014, 01:06 PM,
#73
Member
Posts: 980
Threads: 55
Joined: Jul 2011

(05-28-2014, 12:32 PM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(05-28-2014, 12:18 PM)Snak3 Wrote: Solution to make capital ships less exploitable:

"Aquilon" Zoner Carrier - Cruiser Turrets, BS Shield.
"Nephilim" Zoner Mobile Colony Ship - Cruiser Turrets, BS Shield.
"Corvo" Zoner Deep Space Explorer - Gunboat Turrets, Cruiser Shield
Zoner "Fearless" Q-ship - Cruiser Turrets, Cruiser Shield.

Here. No longer are they heavy capital ships that can be rolled into a fight.

Cruiser and gunboat turrets can still ruin everything.
Transport turrets. No more, no less.


Hm, some time ago, I had set up an excel sheet that summed up my ideas about how zoner caps should be changed, with Jinx`s suggested new models in mind. It was mostly about stats and infocards. I had given Kazinsal the excel-sheet so he could forward it to the rest of the devs.

Unfortunately, for some reason or another it did not reach the responsible devs. I have been told by one of the devs about this.
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
05-28-2014, 01:15 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-28-2014, 01:18 PM by Thyrzul.)
#74
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(05-28-2014, 11:32 AM)Trogdor Wrote: Scumbag, Lyth, Thyrzul. You guys seem to want to put the Zoners in a big box of "Nope". Why? What good will come of turning the Zoners into a generic pile of mush?

I do not want to put them in a box of "Nope", but you have to face the fact that all the three official factions have their own ID now, basically having used the Zoner ID as a generic basis to develop from. And as Tel pointed out, they barely contribute to the overall Zoner development lately.

My concept just aims to drive that further, making being Zoner just a step in becoming a bigger independent entity, like the current official factions are, a phase in which like-minded folks gather but are not numerous enough to declare independence yet, a phase in one's life as Jinx wrote. Once they gather big enough, they'll go independent, and will have to conduct their own diplomacy, will follow their own goals, they will cease to be mere Zoners, just as WPeregrine said too.

My concept would justify having more agressive, neo-ZA-like warmongering groups, given they either sooner or later drop the Zoner way and acquire their own ID, change their behavior or cease to exist. It would justify OSI drifting away the original anti-House anti-corporate Zoner way, becoming a corporations themselves, or could justify anything, as long as once the faction concept becomes more solid, it gets it's own ID. It would justify all those different interpretations we have about what Zoners are and what they can evolve into, removing the need to argue about it with eachother.

With this there would be no need to nerf the caps, only restrict to successor factions, there would be no need to ruin GranCan with bullshit infocards and ice age if a Canarian Republic emerges (with own ID of course), a good amount of unnecessary changes could be prevented if we start looking at the Zoner ID as what it actually is, a basis for further concepts. A generic ID.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline Zen_Mechanics
05-28-2014, 01:53 PM,
#75
Member
Posts: 2,262
Threads: 196
Joined: Oct 2012

(05-28-2014, 01:15 PM)Thyrzul Wrote:
(05-28-2014, 11:32 AM)Trogdor Wrote: Scumbag, Lyth, Thyrzul. You guys seem to want to put the Zoners in a big box of "Nope". Why? What good will come of turning the Zoners into a generic pile of mush?

I do not want to put them in a box of "Nope", but you have to face the fact that all the three official factions have their own ID now, basically having used the Zoner ID as a generic basis to develop from. And as Tel pointed out, they barely contribute to the overall Zoner development lately.

My concept just aims to drive that further, making being Zoner just a step in becoming a bigger independent entity, like the current official factions are, a phase in which like-minded folks gather but are not numerous enough to declare independence yet, a phase in one's life as Jinx wrote. Once they gather big enough, they'll go independent, and will have to conduct their own diplomacy, will follow their own goals, they will cease to be mere Zoners, just as WPeregrine said too.

My concept would justify having more agressive, neo-ZA-like warmongering groups, given they either sooner or later drop the Zoner way and acquire their own ID, change their behavior or cease to exist. It would justify OSI drifting away the original anti-House anti-corporate Zoner way, becoming a corporations themselves, or could justify anything, as long as once the faction concept becomes more solid, it gets it's own ID. It would justify all those different interpretations we have about what Zoners are and what they can evolve into, removing the need to argue about it with eachother.

With this there would be no need to nerf the caps, only restrict to successor factions, there would be no need to ruin GranCan with ***** infocards and ice age if a Canarian Republic emerges (with own ID of course), a good amount of unnecessary changes could be prevented if we start looking at the Zoner ID as what it actually is, a basis for further concepts. A generic ID.

I can't believe' but im saying it anyway, I agree completely

Were fools to make war on our brothers in arms.

Reply  
Offline Scumbag
05-28-2014, 01:57 PM,
#76
Member
Posts: 1,010
Threads: 82
Joined: Dec 2011

So do I, Thyrzul managed to make sense out of a pile of whatever this constant bickering is.
Reply  
Offline Mercarryn
05-28-2014, 02:50 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-28-2014, 02:51 PM by Mercarryn.)
#77
Member
Posts: 980
Threads: 55
Joined: Jul 2011

Hear, hear!

I agree with what Thyrzul wrote. The only issue that concerns me is, that through a generic Zoner ID like he describes too many different player factions emerge while at the same time vanilla house corporate factions might become neglected.

How could this be solved then?
Reply  
Offline Sabru
05-28-2014, 03:08 PM,
#78
Member
Posts: 2,274
Threads: 262
Joined: Jan 2012

(05-28-2014, 02:50 PM)Mercarryn Wrote: Hear, hear!

I agree with what Thyrzul wrote. The only issue that concerns me is, that through a generic Zoner ID like he describes too many different player factions emerge while at the same time vanilla house corporate factions might become neglected.

How could this be solved then?

* Sabru nods in agreement.

mercarryn has a good point. how would the issue of balance and numbers be solved?

apart from that, Thyr's proposal is quite sound.

[Image: 9KgNaeX.png]
Reply  
Offline Scumbag
05-28-2014, 03:18 PM,
#79
Member
Posts: 1,010
Threads: 82
Joined: Dec 2011

Zoners would still not be allowed to trade in the houses. If too many arise, they will compete over the same resources.
Reply  
Offline SMGSterlin
05-28-2014, 03:32 PM,
#80
Member
Posts: 2,207
Threads: 81
Joined: Feb 2010

@Thryzul's idea;

So your suggestion is essentially turning the Zoners into not much more than Freelancers. If that's the case, then why even keep Zoners as a thing? Just change all of their stuff to Freelancer and be done with it. This is even easier to do now, since Zoners had (or will have) their caps removed, removing any conflict with the FL ID not allowing caps.

You don't need a Zoner ID as the bases to develop a faction and get your own ID. Just because 3 player factions right now took that path, doesn't mean it's the only path available. Take The Reavers or Mandalorian Mercenaries for example, they were old Freelancer ID'd factions back in .85, but then they got their own ID's, bases, and diplomacy.

Zoners just really don't have a purpose in this mod anymore, even the player factions that made Zoners successful that now have their own ID's and systems, shy away from calling themselves Zoners. Various groups over the years have devolved the title of "Zoner" into something negative, that immediately brands you as a lolwut or bad player.

[Image: smgsterlin.gif]
Reply  
Pages (10): « Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode