Believe me I'd use it if I could. However as it's from outside Discovery by now HIGHLY likely used in another mod we can't use it. (breaks the 'No Models from outside mods rule' they have going.)
(05-17-2016, 11:52 PM)Commissar SnakeLancer™ Wrote: Bumping this up. Ofc if we can find our 4.86 Cruiser model and use it as transport, I'd have nothing against it 8|
Give me a name, converting it to a transport shouldn't be a problem.
(05-17-2016, 11:52 PM)Commissar SnakeLancer™ Wrote: Bumping this up. Ofc if we can find our 4.86 Cruiser model and use it as transport, I'd have nothing against it 8|
Give me a name, converting it to a transport shouldn't be a problem.
"Hammer" works. LWB Have Sichel already else we would've used Sickle prolly, but go with Hammer.
EDIT: Well choose one, "Sickle" or "Hammer" I just noticed LWB uses "Sichel" and not "Sickle"
Oh hey yeah this. Vulk wanted me to re-texture the old 4.85 Typhoon model and scale it up to act as a makeshift battletransport. Not sure how I feel about the idea yet, the 4.86 version may be better and I intend to look at both side by side and see if either is workable.
(03-27-2019, 08:38 PM)Durandal Wrote: Oh hey yeah this. Vulk wanted me to re-texture the old 4.85 Typhoon model and scale it up to act as a makeshift battletransport. Not sure how I feel about the idea yet, the 4.86 version may be better and I intend to look at both side by side and see if either is workable.
I can also see the 4.86 one working, my logic with the 4.85 model was it looks like it could have a rear bay door just pop open for easy cargo loading(with a little modification of course)
For reference:
![[+]](/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
4.86 Model
