(05-19-2017, 03:14 AM)Morosz Wrote: I'm pretty sure that transport of yours was the reason the ESRD called for our help. So how about you not ruin snubfights with big fat things eh? Cheers Widow.
NemNemNem. My little friend, when you arrived there was a 1v1 going on and the transport was on standby.
You just came in gunho as usual!! Anyway this is the [LN] Feedback thread not the 5th|'s so keep your lolwut comments to yourself. Your reinforcement was OP and completely uncalled for, a Cruiser and a BC for a transport is pure gank up the butt. You even brought bombers.
I'd like to shed some light on that little fiasco that happened earlier.
Two ESRD Ops entered Leeds (which we didn't plan on staying but my perfect navigation skills took us to a disabled gate that we sat at, trying to figure out directions).
Two [RN] log on, no problem, I check the list to see what we get to fight. Two three [RN] ships logged in. Two of the snub level, then one '[RN]-RNS-Party.Boat'. Not having encountered aforementioned ship before, along with the RNS attachment and rank, the ESRD Operatives assumed it was an Obstinate. No problem, as we had agreed to a duel of 2v2.
The fight starts after a small bit of roleplay. Everything seems fine, the 'gunboat' seemed too close for comfort for the ESRD, when it opened fire, on what (in hindsight) was a NPC. Not knowing that the Party.Boat was shooting at NPCs and not at the Liberty ships (which it seemed like it was, as some of the shots were really close). So, instinctively, we switched targets to shove the ship away. A few warning shots later and the armored transport started shooting.
Of course, we did not take that lightly, and one of the ESRD called for 5th| assistance for 'gunboat deterrence', still not knowing that the ship was, in fact, an armored transport. They all look the same to me.
While trying to gain distance from the 'gunship/armored transport' to finish the now-biased duel, one ESRD operative was, as he claimed it, 'being EK cruised' constantly by the larger ship. When finally getting a duel, an unwarranted outcast (which he knows who he is) appeared and began to attack the ESRD's dueling opponent. That is when the Party.Boat entered the battle a second time.
When the 5th| arrived, instead of finding one or two bombers to scare the Party.Boat off, a large battlecruiser-cruiser-bomber party showed up. No problem, Archangel extracted themselves from the battle, citing 'complete chaos ruining a simple fight' while the 5th| did their thing. The [LN] was done with the battle, they did not wish to be involved any more.
A chain of misunderstandings caused a simple 2v2 to change to a three-way battle involving one snub, one armored transport, and one capital-hunter-destroyer party, which proceeded to decimate the other two parties.
We'll try to increase situational awareness to a higher level when combating the [RN] next time, but remember that keeping a battletransport, gunboat, or anything else dangerous-appearing that can easily tip the battle close to a balanced fight creates tension very quickly for the smaller side.
For clarification from our (5th) side, when we asked what type of reinforcement to bring, we were told cruisers. So we gathered a force of one LABC, one LSC, a fighter, and a bomber. I didn't realize what special brand of overkill we had unleashed until I scanned the transport seconds before death, but by then it was too late to stop.
Oh dear more negative feedback for the LN and I suspect it's in the same form and same member where I complained here about the last time.
Lets see, the interaction was pretty normal, nothing spectacular but certainly more interesting than the standard 2 lines of RP before engagement and all was going well up until the point where we get that OCC reference to my forum name Tick tack.
Quote:[30.05.2017 23:30:42] Ted: Keep tellin yerself dat
[30.05.2017 23:31:03] Ted: Wa's da ESRD 'ny ways
[30.05.2017 23:31:04] 2017-05-30 22:31:09 SMT Traffic control alert: Ted has requested to dock
[30.05.2017 23:31:09] [LN]-LNS-Mount.Hood: Yo momma. [30.05.2017 23:31:16] [LN]-Silver|ESRD: Tick. Tack.
[30.05.2017 23:31:19] Auto-Buy(Cloak Batteries): Bought 388 unit(s), cost: 9.700$
Yes yes you could argue that he wasn't referring to my forum name but honestly who would you be trying to fool there it's quiet clear he's referring to me since the PM logs show he knows it is in fact me.
Quote:30.05.2017 23:36:39] [LN]-Silver|ESRD: //You were the one that pm'd me, so i suppose you have a problem.
[30.05.2017 23:37:17] Ted: // I had a problem with you going oorp and refering to my forum name in a RP enviornment
[30.05.2017 23:37:28] [LN]-Silver|ESRD: //Where did i went oorp?
[30.05.2017 23:37:57] Ted: // where you said Tick. Tack.
[30.05.2017 23:38:00] [LN]-Silver|ESRD: //Now imagine how I figured it out.
When I tried to work the issue out with him via pm, not only did he seem to throw references that had nothing to do with the matter in question, he in fact called my behavior trollish when all I was doing was escaping lawfulls, but to be fair to him I guess he was a little annoyed I escaped him 5 times in the space of an hour.
Ticktack, I'm getting tired of seeing you in here. It appears you have a problem with one member or another or the way you don't get a fair fight or something, and seem to take it out on the entire faction in the feedback.
Unless you have constructive, helpful feedback for the forum addressed to the [LN] feedback that is either logical or positive, I'm not going to put up with you.
(05-31-2017, 12:55 AM)Inferno Wrote: Ticktack, I'm getting tired of seeing you in here. It appears you have a problem with one member or another or the way you don't get a fair fight or something, and seem to take it out on the entire faction in the feedback.
Unless you have constructive, helpful feedback for the forum addressed to the [LN] feedback that is either logical or positive, I'm not going to put up with you.
Your complaints have been acknowledged, again.
I'm not complaining about getting a fair fight, I'm complaining about one of your members going oorp and referring to my char by his forum name. But if you want to put a faceless "complaints have been acknowledged" on it and hope the matter disappears fine.
Also dave, don't have anything constructive to post then don't post.
![[Image: kallistesilver.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/kallistesilver.gif)