• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 651 652 653 654 655 … 779 Next »
A message from above?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (7): « Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
A message from above?
Offline Jinx
06-04-2008, 10:45 AM,
#41
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

living proof of how careful you gotto be about what you write in a chat the higher your "rank" is within the community. - but what about the factions that have no authority within their ranks. - BHG, zoners, IMG etc. - none of those have a parent playerfaction that can justify the authority to allow or forbid ships. nither in roleplay, nor as a faction rule.

however, i find it very interesting cause it answers the one question i made the thread for - the question about authorities.....

as it stands, the right to govern a given space has extended from a purchased guard system to ALL the zone of interest - or so it seems, since that statement includes not only the ships sold in guard systems, but all warships ( and for the sake of RP - most probably all faction ships )

gotto be very careful that we don t cut our own freedom too much to surpress ... errr.. <strike>terrorism</strike> / rogue captains *cough* ... too soon, we might realize that we have no more choice of weapons, ships etc. anymore, a major aspect of the game. ( and the choice of faction is limited, too - since we are free to make factions invite only or decline applications )

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline Cyberanson
06-04-2008, 11:09 AM,
#42
Member
Posts: 1,555
Threads: 100
Joined: Mar 2008

I agree with Jinx' opinion. We're running in danger of too clear borders in the RP. You know "I'm the good guy, you are the bad guy." things will flood Sirius when you HAVE to join a certain faction or at least get their permission to obtain certain things like ships/weapons/items...

Really hard days for indies now when diversity dies.

ALG Waste Disposal
Faction Status - Recruitment - Message Dump
[Image: image.png]
Rheinland Military Information Center | Marinenachrichtendienst Central Computer
  Reply  
Offline podcof
06-04-2008, 12:04 PM,
#43
Member
Posts: 89
Threads: 6
Joined: Apr 2008

*points a Pim* WITCH!!!! i shall destroy you with my LPI Liberator :P

___________
Alex.Vega[101st]
Omicron-85: KEEP OUT! |
  Reply  
Offline Eppy
06-04-2008, 12:28 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-04-2008, 12:29 PM by Eppy.)
#44
Member
Posts: 3,865
Threads: 162
Joined: Apr 2007

Diversity isn't dying because we're restricting capships, mate. The 101st has no plans to tighten the reigns beyond restricting the Outcast Gunboat, which may or may not happen depending on how badly it's whored (which means you'll probably be writing for our permission:lol:). That and Outcast territory is where our range stops. It isn't practical for a player faction to do any more than that anyways. Fighters are too easy to get anyways, and why in hell would we stop someone from flying a Sabre? (not that I can, it's Borderworlds, not Outcast). It's a waste of resources. We don't charge passage and the only place we restrict access to is our Guard system. You can do whatever you want as long as you don't go in the Guard system and you don't do stupid things in big ships.

...though, instating some sort of taxation might be nice...:laugh:

Quote:Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen
Eppy Wrote:Which Dreadnought was that?
n00bl3t Wrote:One of your nine. Tongue
Reply  
Offline Exsiled_one
06-04-2008, 12:43 PM,
#45
Member
Posts: 3,621
Threads: 137
Joined: Mar 2008

I don't understand why do people say this thing cripples their roleplay. I bet you everything that eppy has no plan to forbid anyone to use a capship if the player presents a good story to the outcast.
Isn't that actually encouraging you guys, yanno you that say this will choke their rp to have fun?

[Image: omgsig.png]

<span style="color:#33CC00">I AM GIVING AWAY MONEY TO CREATIVE MINDS*</span>
  Reply  
Offline Cyberanson
06-04-2008, 01:28 PM,
#46
Member
Posts: 1,555
Threads: 100
Joined: Mar 2008

This wasn't my point, sorry if I didn't make myself clear. I guess I overrated this situation, because I muddled up 'permission' and 'restriction'. What I did was drawing the line into the future, seeing a Discovery mod without indies and only factions, which claim systems, weapons, ships,... like a dogma.

Anyways... let's see how much we get affected by that.

Besides I think it would be more challenging for cap whores, if there would be more appropriate shipyards for every NPC faction. It would be a lot more harder if you could obtain battleships in the guard systems only.

ALG Waste Disposal
Faction Status - Recruitment - Message Dump
[Image: image.png]
Rheinland Military Information Center | Marinenachrichtendienst Central Computer
  Reply  
Offline Exsiled_one
06-04-2008, 03:15 PM,
#47
Member
Posts: 3,621
Threads: 137
Joined: Mar 2008

Thats actually a mighty fine idea. Or at least licences.

[Image: omgsig.png]

<span style="color:#33CC00">I AM GIVING AWAY MONEY TO CREATIVE MINDS*</span>
  Reply  
Offline sovereign
06-04-2008, 06:00 PM,
#48
Member
Posts: 3,893
Threads: 38
Joined: Feb 2008

See the ID proposal. We're working on it, you would need a guard ID to fly capships. And guard ID = full guard rep (not necessarily guard tag).

[Image: SCRAgenderheuristics.png]
  Reply  
Offline n00bl3t
06-05-2008, 02:25 AM,
#49
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:living proof of how careful you gotto be about what you write in a chat the higher your "rank" is within the community. - but what about the factions that have no authority within their ranks. - BHG, zoners, IMG etc. - none of those have a parent playerfaction that can justify the authority to allow or forbid ships. nither in roleplay, nor as a faction rule.

however, i find it very interesting cause it answers the one question i made the thread for - the question about authorities.....

as it stands, the right to govern a given space has extended from a purchased guard system to ALL the zone of interest - or so it seems, since that statement includes not only the ships sold in guard systems, but all warships ( and for the sake of RP - most probably all faction ships )

gotto be very careful that we don t cut our own freedom too much to surpress ... errr.. <strike>terrorism</strike> / rogue captains *cough* ... too soon, we might realize that we have no more choice of weapons, ships etc. anymore, a major aspect of the game. ( and the choice of faction is limited, too - since we are free to make factions invite only or decline applications )

Faction restrictions should apply only in their purchased system, not extend to their ZoI.

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Reply  
Offline sovereign
06-05-2008, 02:27 AM,
#50
Member
Posts: 3,893
Threads: 38
Joined: Feb 2008

Take a wild guess what system has the shipyard that builds said capital ships. OMIGOSH its the guard system, owned by OMIGOSH the player faction.

>.>

Plus, nobody minds OC dessies or Liberty anything getting restricted, right now they cling to fighter engagements like flies to poo....

[Image: SCRAgenderheuristics.png]
  Reply  
Pages (7): « Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode