3.4 Intentionally ramming a capitol ship in order to ''flip'' it or ''catapult'' your ship away from it.
I still think this should include liners, Years ago some certain official xeno faction members used this exploit when i had a junker Pilgrim liner to flip my ship and keep me from being able to target them. So only stating in cap ships could still lead some to think it is ok to do it to other big ships. So it should read....
3.4 Intentionally ramming a large ship in order to ''flip'' it or ''catapult'' your ship away from it.
or
3.4 Intentionally ramming a capitol or liner ship in order to ''flip'' it or ''catapult'' your ship away from it.
This thread is not intended to ask for rule changes, only for ways to put existing rules into a better format.
Also, "flipping" liners and transports is a technique considered legitimate to keep them from docking with lanes and gates. Without it piracy would be very hard in certain situations.
(04-22-2018, 02:00 PM)Karlotta Wrote: This thread is not intended to ask for rule changes, only for ways to put existing rules into a better format.
Also, "flipping" liners and transports is a technique considered legitimate to keep them from docking with lanes and gates. Without it piracy would be very hard in certain situations.
Don't feel it is legit, small fighter smashing against a large Pilgrim would realistically be scrap metal. But whatever.
(Also asking them to be shortened does mean you are asking for rules changes in a way)
And sorry i posted this on your thread but i have mentioned this needed changed years ago, ramming any large ship should be considered an exploit.
![[Image: w3gBAeX.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/w3gBAeX.gif)
