POB Siege Participants

[LaWey]

Point more not about quality of RP but more about no anonim/indie sieging.
Also, if there about that PoB in Colorado..that obviously had set in too ruining pirate gameplay way. That only was question of time about shooting it in any case.

[Egon Bigmemes]

What's the difference?

[SnakThree]

People should be held responsible and actually provide forum roleplay before being able to "register" for siege.

Like when the Lane Hackers reported seeing a PoB and then signed up to siege shortly after with no prior RP, besides seeing it?

Apparently blockading stations without declaration can be against the rules, so yeah.

But seeing you here, pointing fingers at me, where I did exactly what I am promoting here, only shows how little you have understanding over the issue and you would rather take opportunity for some easy mud-slinging. Poor form.

---

[Egon Bigmemes]

What exactly did you do?

The thread says to post roleplay where you show intent to attack a base, where instead you pointed to a post saying you found the base.

As an aside, it's never been difficult to fling mud at you, it's just a waste of time, since you've consistently rolled around in it for years.

---

Its no time to compose some like this: Roses are red, Violets are blue, please, please, please gallics, dont shoot, or i kill you.

[Karst]

Why?
Suppliers need zero roleplay to log their 5kers and supply a base that doesn't even have an allied IFF. Defenders need no roleplay to log random unlawful cruisers to defend a base. Why should attackers have to?

What about the POBs that do roleplay to get suppliers in 5kers involved? What about POBs that do roleplay to get additional help in defending those POBs?

That's fine and dandy, but if secondary suppliers and defenders are not required to post roleplay for their actions, neither should attackers.

---

[Venkman]

What exactly did you do?

The thread says to post roleplay where you show intent to attack a base, where instead you pointed to a post saying you found the base.

At least he didn't edit the screenshots this time.

---

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206147
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206210
Time left: (Permanent)

[Felipe]

But Defenders arent trying to destroy all the effort people put on base, attackers do. So at least should need some effort for that, and not just "lol, lemme log this shared BS"

---

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2329969
Time left: (Permanent)

[SnakThree]

What exactly did you do?

The thread says to post roleplay where you show intent to attack a base, where instead you pointed to a post saying you found the base.

As an aside, it's never been difficult to fling mud at you, it's just a waste of time, since you've consistently rolled around in it for years.

Apparently you missed the whole thread just for the chance to have a go at me. Read it first, please.

---

[Lythrilux]

Why?
Suppliers need zero roleplay to log their 5kers and supply a base that doesn't even have an allied IFF. Defenders need no roleplay to log random unlawful cruisers to defend a base. Why should attackers have to?

What about the POBs that do roleplay to get suppliers in 5kers involved? What about POBs that do roleplay to get additional help in defending those POBs?

That's fine and dandy, but if secondary suppliers and defenders are not required to post roleplay for their actions, neither should attackers.

Considering attackers have nothing to lose aside from a few moments of time - and a base siege requires very little effort in comparison to POBs themselves - I don't see how an RP requirement to give their siege at least a bit more credence would be so unfair.

---

[Egon Bigmemes]

Apparently you missed the whole thread just for the chance to have a go at me. Read it first, please.

Gimme a tl;dr since apparently you require four pages of posts to explain what you mean instead getting it across in your very first post.

My ameriburger nature prevents me from reading for long periods of time.