• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 585 586 587 588 589 … 778 Next »
Admin Team Reinforcements

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Do you agree with promoting Dieter Shprockets to RP server administrator?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
73.85%
144 73.85%
No
26.15%
51 26.15%
Total 195 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (15): « Previous 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 15 Next »
Thread Closed 
Admin Team Reinforcements
Offline n00bl3t
01-10-2009, 03:44 AM,
#81
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:In earnest, I am extremely disappointed with the no votes who decided to remain unspoken. Your opinions could have had a strong impact on the method by which this process is conducted in addition to addressing your grievances to the oncoming generation.

Bad show.

People have the option to remain anonymous, why should they forsake this right for you?

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Offline Dusty Lens
01-10-2009, 03:48 AM,
#82
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

' Wrote:People have the option to remain anonymous, why should they forsake this right for you?

I'm rather of the mind that offering constructive criticisms to both ways only serves to improve the system.

Yes votes, as observed by the commentary, don't necessarily lend much to the conversation while opinions feeling that these persons do -not- rate their positions may carry something of substance that should be taken into consideration.

Oh, wait, I mean because I eat your sacrifice of personal liberties like sweet sweet delicious pies. Forsake your all for me!!!!

/lolmelodrama

Edit: Also something about the establishment putting down the man. YAR.
Offline n00bl3t
01-10-2009, 03:55 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-10-2009, 03:56 AM by n00bl3t.)
#83
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:I'm rather of the mind that offering constructive criticisms to both ways only serves to improve the system.

Yes votes, as observed by the commentary, don't necessarily lend much to the conversation while opinions feeling that these persons do -not- rate their positions may carry something of substance that should be taken into consideration.

Yes, however, doubt in the system, or doubt that your opinion will carry weight, considering the amount of yes votes already can stop someone from wanting to post something.

Laziness to post something on the other hand, is bad form.

Edit: Yes, I am not addressing the other parts of your post.

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Offline horvat
01-10-2009, 03:58 AM,
#84
Member
Posts: 276
Threads: 10
Joined: Sep 2008

I voted and I'm sure they will be fine Admins, although that position is dull. Good luck lads

http://zeltak.com/
[Image: overtrolltest.png]

 
Offline farmerman
01-10-2009, 04:03 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-10-2009, 04:06 AM by farmerman.)
#85
Off in space for a bit
Posts: 3,215
Threads: 162
Joined: Jul 2008

I voted yes for all three and have had many interactions with all of them, in game and otherwise. Here are my thoughts:

All the interactions I've had with Dieter in game have been quite good, and he seems to be a very fair person given what I've seen with him and the KNF/BAF events so far.

In game interactions with JihadJoe seem to involve him shooting me, which means I'll avoid him if he's in the game as an admin. :P But seriously, he even seems to manage to rp well while fighting, and outside of the game he seems to know what's what and is willing to share his insight.

Marburg helped me a great deal when I was starting out (and I think he would with anyone) and seems to try and add more to the Disco Universe than most people I know. I think of everyone I know on Disco, he's easily in the top two best possible candidates for the job.

Though I am concerned there is a vast Gaian conspiracy and no one told me. :O

[Image: 4986_s.gif]
Faction info links: Samura Heavy Industries : LWB : Watchers
Offline guitarguy
01-10-2009, 04:07 AM,
#86
Member
Posts: 429
Threads: 30
Joined: Nov 2008

Yes to all, they know what they're doing.

[Image: dfcz.png][Image: frcl.png][Image: dscz.jpg][Image: 19979982.jpg]
[Image: u3cld.jpg]
| BAF Faction Information | BAF War Bonds | BAF Training Program | BAF Combat Training Manual |
 
Offline DragonLancer
01-10-2009, 07:45 AM,
#87
Banned
Posts: 661
Threads: 37
Joined: Aug 2008

Yay for Dieter.

But I only know him so far and the great work he do, especially the BAF/KNF coordination thing which is a hell of work.

But perhaps an additional 'non voting' option would be great.
I cannot assess the work of the two other candidates so I'm currently forced to vote 'No'. :(

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=147045
Time left: (Permanent)
Karlotta
01-10-2009, 10:30 AM,
#88
Unregistered
 

I dont know any of them and voted yes for all because I alike admins. There should be more admins.
Offline kindred
01-10-2009, 10:43 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-10-2009, 10:47 AM by kindred.)
#89
Member
Posts: 1,699
Threads: 9
Joined: Sep 2007

' Wrote:In earnest, I am extremely disappointed with the no votes who decided to remain unspoken. Your opinions could have had a strong impact on the method by which this process is conducted in addition to addressing your grievances to the oncoming generation.

Bad show.
Have you considered that some people might not be comfortable speaking against someone who might become a admin, knowing that his statement might be held against him by this new admin.
Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer. And on that note i support all three for admin *winks*




Devtonia ; all-or-nothing approach to bias.
Offline kacijon
01-10-2009, 11:01 AM,
#90
Member
Posts: 428
Threads: 36
Joined: Mar 2008

I voted YES for all of them...

ANd I hope They know in what are they going.

Good luck to all 3.

Former CEO of BMM
I had women, gold, luxury, carpets and luxury liner....
 
Pages (15): « Previous 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 15 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode