K'Hara Feeeeeeed back

[Lusitano]

and like i said before, but was remove, i took the fight and after it one corsair bomber camed to help. it was a good fight, and the only reason i didn't gave him the kudos was because that bad rp, otherwise i would have give it to him also

[The_Godslayer]

I'm not sure which part of "Combatant Antagonist" you guys are missing. Here, let me break it down:

Combatant means we do combat. Our main goal is to kill humans faster than they can reproduce. Anything servicing the goal of causing as much human death as possible. Destroying bases, destroying transports, destroying battleships, destroying fighters, and glassing planets is our path. We attack, we kill. This doesn't mean we don't RP, RP is still a requirement to get into the faction. This means we have our goals straight, and are not going to sit 80K above a star to jack off your faction with premeditated roleplay. There are people I know for a fact that have had some form of roleplay encounter with K'hara recently, for example, a very sad Corsair. We are not Huggie's uwu hentai squids, and have not been for a while. We are a hostile alien race hell bent on deleting humanity from territory that is rightfully ours by any means necessary. We are in the killing business. We do combat.

Antagonist means that we are actively oppositional and hostile. We are not kind, we don't change our minds, we are not benevolent. We don't help granny cross the street, we don't make friends, we don't run around on emotions. We are an intelligent collective who's learned that they can theoretically do war better than humans can, and are working to put that into action. We're not a force of good, we are a force of objective fact. We don't care how some special snowflake human feels. It's human, it's getting killed one way or another.

@Lusitano if you're going to come at me and my faction with accusations, at least bring something better than "I do have evidence, but I won't show it". Come on, even Gypsie had evidence to back up his claims. You get ignored because you don't bring anything but your own hurt feelings.

LOLOLOL acusation no! facts. i do have a screenshot that i took after the fight with your buddy said not for what he said but forkudos purpose but then i thought .. nahh not worthy. i don't have timestamps but since you guys have someadmins, they can check it, if your faction is so good why such bad feedback and why you people reply with insults, tthat even mods had to remove. but ok here is what your member said. before this was one more sentence and one mine say "hello there". afterbhe wrote the last sentence he started fire, while i was writing and my luck was that i looked to the screen and saw that a shf shiled was more than 1/2 down. the rules said that "engaging" is not enought butn at least if i read "engaging" i know that the fight was goingto start.

again i don't give a f about your stupid faction, and ifnyou peoplecan't take a simple comment and opinion and start calling liars and even more, ... well who cares right? even the rules are in your favour and your faction rooster protect all your actions.

so next timei see one of you guys i simple do the same. write a stupid sentence and start shooting.

strong evidence. very convincing.

---

I'll do something about my superiority complex when I cease to be superior.

"Whatever happened to catchin' a good old-fashioned passionate ass-whoopin and gettin' your shoes, coat, and your hat tooken?"

[Ice Princess]

and like i said before, but was remove, i took the fight and after it one corsair bomber camed to help. it was a good fight, and the only reason i didn't gave him the kudos was because that bad rp, otherwise i would have give it to him also

And like we said before, if you come to a feedback thread, provide evidence of your claims or don't post at all.

---

[Lusitano]

try now

[Lusitano]

more evidence ask forone server admin, to check all timestamps,because like i said, i don't make collections of this, and only took the screenshot for the name for the kudos that after that i realized it wasn't worthy.

[Krumai]

Honestly Lusitano, I would be better off not criticizing and remaining silent. If you have no evidence to back up, please don't make things worse by posting baseless accusations. It helps you learn how to handle stuff like this. K'Hara| is meant to be an "antagonistic" faction towards humans, not like the Vagrants who are willing to help factinos like Auxesia.

[Lusitano]

damn you people really don't like that peoplegive you honest opinions, but like i said before, next time i see one of you, i just type a stupid thing and start shootoing without any warning, so goodbye and take care of your litle faction, that as we can see, is loved by all

[Miaou]

- something to do for people who have trouble with english

1.3 - All text / communications must be in understandable English.

---

Characters & Stories

[Lemon]

You know...we lived in the past. At the end of the day, K'hara isn't past K'hara, they would fail activity checks without /1/2/3 buttcloackers.

Not sure if your positive reminiscence of past K'Hara refers only to activity or also of RP quality, but in my experience the mentions of the golden olden days coming from various people are commonly ripe with exaggerations and veiled self praise. Not only when it comes to K'Hara or Keepers or who ever.

Nah, even when I started K'hara roleplayed more, Godslayer/Ice/Saronsen weren't playing nomads actively during my active months . They came back, some very simplistic indies got accepted and the /1/2/3 became the norm. Lately win pure buttcloack 0RP element (Zun'Doon aka Assasin). It was confirmed that internal requirements for RP and quality of accepted members were relaxed also.

I mean that's fine - they are open about it and as long as they do creative things like raiding different houses, pseudo-events like the Entity one and actually use the pure hostile no RP element creatively on a regular basis they still will be beneficial to the server.

[Kauket]

not like the Vagrants who are willing to help factinos like Auxesia.

Who said we weren't the bad guys?

---