• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 46 Next »
Announcement: House Governments

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (22): « Previous 1 … 12 13 14 15 16 … 22 Next »
Thread Closed 
Announcement: House Governments
Offline Haste
10-26-2023, 01:09 PM,
#131
Lead Developer
Posts: 3,565
Threads: 107
Joined: May 2012
Staff roles:
Balance Dev

(10-26-2023, 01:05 PM)TheSauron Wrote: Even with this change, can't the governments work as before anyway? You can still have your 14 person government do their votes, then just have the Liberty OFs vote in the OfficialTM one in line with the results. Granted, this requires the OFs to honour the results and vote accordingly, but I'm pretty sure govs work on a good faith basis as is.

Also edit, you could still have the same non OFL people write the paperwork if you need it, just have an OFL post ir for review.

Correct. Even if we wanted to, we obviously can't stop players from organizing House/Government Discords or whatever and discussing things in there, and making the communication with staff a formality.

[Image: cdSeFev.png]
Offline Saronsen
10-26-2023, 01:12 PM,
#132
Member
Posts: 1,688
Threads: 106
Joined: Mar 2009

(10-26-2023, 01:05 PM)TheSauron Wrote: Even with this change, can't the governments work as before anyway? You can still have your 14 person government do their votes, then just have the Liberty OFs vote in the OfficialTM one in line with the results. Granted, this requires the OFs to honour the results and vote accordingly, but I'm pretty sure govs work on a good faith basis as is.
its possible, but why not just settle on approving government posts through the forums, since that seems to be the intent?
if someone really wants to audit governments just ask to come to their discord
Offline SnakThree
10-26-2023, 01:12 PM,
#133
Member
Posts: 9,091
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

(10-26-2023, 01:09 PM)Haste Wrote:
(10-26-2023, 01:05 PM)TheSauron Wrote: Even with this change, can't the governments work as before anyway? You can still have your 14 person government do their votes, then just have the Liberty OFs vote in the OfficialTM one in line with the results. Granted, this requires the OFs to honour the results and vote accordingly, but I'm pretty sure govs work on a good faith basis as is.

Also edit, you could still have the same non OFL people write the paperwork if you need it, just have an OFL post ir for review.

Correct. Even if we wanted to, we obviously can't stop players from organizing House/Government Discords or whatever and discussing things in there, and making the communication with staff a formality.

Then allow them all into this new chat so everything is transparent and no behind the scenes discussions are required.

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
 
Offline Saronsen
10-26-2023, 01:14 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-26-2023, 01:19 PM by Saronsen.)
#134
Member
Posts: 1,688
Threads: 106
Joined: Mar 2009

(10-26-2023, 01:12 PM)SnakThree Wrote: Then allow them all into this new chat so everything is transparent and no behind the scenes discussions are required.
same thing i suggested to haste
people are worried about schemes in private, why not just welcome everyone? making governments an "OF perk" just seems like a lazy way to handwave unofficial factions involvement (haste has already indicated to me that he'd want others involved)
Offline Sarawr!?
10-26-2023, 02:15 PM,
#135
THE LAWH
Posts: 2,311
Threads: 117
Joined: Oct 2008

You guys better pick the right person to supervise House governments, or this will be a colossal disaster.

[Image: CHI4y9i.png]
[LN] Recruitment | Rachel Baker Bio

Offline Lythrilux
10-26-2023, 02:36 PM,
#136
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,355
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

Realistically this will only really work if the Staff are dedicated to the concept. Otherwise it's just extra beaucracy. Inevitably players are also still gonna make their own cliques within Govs anyway.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Offline Kherty
10-28-2023, 08:55 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-28-2023, 08:59 PM by Kherty.)
#137
Trust Me, I'm Everywhere
Posts: 811
Threads: 141
Joined: Mar 2013

(10-26-2023, 02:15 PM)Sarawr!? Wrote: You guys better pick the right person to supervise House governments, or this will be a colossal disaster.

I have severe doubts for GalGov. We ran it as an Assembly, with votes and advisors to make sure it will not impact the playerbase. We had unofficial factions reps, unofficial lawful reps, also weighing in, so that they also have a voice in the Assembly. Many decisions were modified to fit with the rest of the faction. We even had third-parties from other horizons, who played in Gallia but were not part of factions, to weigh in, and give us insights. Nothing was perfect of course, nothing is.

A single person, not gonna name them due to the controversy, will now represent a House, from what I see. And each decision, will be subject to a long review. The staff complained about being overworked? They just gave themselves overtime - grocery store overtime. Licenses will take a while, responses between inRP reps. will take a while: before, it worked well, and I have, and I questioned few others (ex-) members of other governments, that no incident warranted such a response.

IRL, governments are made of people elected, directly or indirectly depending on their separate laws. I believe having representatives of factions, like we used to do, and were proud to do so for an ENTIRE YEAR, is something to think about.

For me, I am against this change due to how the unOF, unlawfuls, and unlawfulOFs are not represented. What if this said person, who is, essentially, in its very definition a despot [for Gallia] (alongside how the staff now leads the government, so add an "s" to it). I am saddened, that my goal of trying to make Gallia better, we finally made the laws, we finally made the licenses. In short, I am disappointed.



For legal reasons, this is an opinion. Please do not take it as an attack or anything, take it as face value. If you want, it is a critique: no strong words were used, no critics of persons were realized. I am simply criticizing this decision.



Please reply to my questions please. It has been a while. These questions are paramount, at least about how I will act in the future.

"Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously." - Hunter S. Thompson
Favorite song
Second favorite song
Third favorite song
Did you sent something to me/factions/etc. and I forgot about it? Please send a message >here<!
[Image: 4YNVxKW.png]
Offline Lemon
10-28-2023, 11:02 PM,
#138
The Legendary Lemon
Posts: 2,360
Threads: 114
Joined: Apr 2020

Full disclosure so it doesn't seem like staff dictate everything now - it's actually me pestering staff to make sure everything is in line with canon and story and econ plans, not the other way around.
Offline Mr.Jamison
10-29-2023, 05:57 AM, (This post was last modified: 10-29-2023, 06:16 AM by Mr.Jamison.)
#139
Banned
Posts: 115
Threads: 17
Joined: May 2022

And.... One logical step to making this actually believable as a working paradigm would include making it a rule that any Staff members making these decisions may not also be an OF leader. (not that I believe it would make any real difference)
Otherwise, this approach only leads to a widely held belief that Staff/OF's are colluding to empower their groups. This concept has taken down multiple mods before this one, mostly because that widely held belief turns out to be well founded eventually. And even if it's not true players will believe it anyway. Staff controlling RP inevitably has a chilling effect on player interaction.
Human nature is irrepressible, and even if well intentioned and perfectly executed, (which is very unlikely) enough of the player base will find faults to be outraged about and this plan will eventually become an acid-rain that dissolves this community.
Those considering being a part of it would be better off just dropping a grenade in their shorts right now.

User was banned for: Possibly compromised account.

https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=204206
Time left: (Permanent)
Offline Redcroft
10-29-2023, 09:01 AM,
#140
Freedom Fighter
Posts: 425
Threads: 43
Joined: Aug 2013

If its not gonna work out then i am sure they revert it back to the old ways. Lets wait and see for now eh?
Pages (22): « Previous 1 … 12 13 14 15 16 … 22 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode