• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 354 355 356 357 358 … 388 Next »
Status of BlackSquadron

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (8): « Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Status of BlackSquadron
Offline torchwood
12-20-2008, 11:01 PM,
#51
Member
Posts: 721
Threads: 54
Joined: Sep 2007

Wolfpack is right, this matter has gotten out of hand, and as finer job as the Admirals do they are just not around enough to handle it. i fully back this. sorry to say it but he is right.

[Image: 27wzuo4.png]
  Reply  
Offline Caedes
12-21-2008, 01:02 AM,
#52
Order Operative
Posts: 197
Threads: 21
Joined: Oct 2007

As I am the newest recruit, I was not really aware of any of these major problems until some other members pointed them out to me.

I will keep my fighter docked on Lisbon station while I do some reading of the forums (both Discovery and BlackSquadron).
Reply  
Offline sovereign
12-21-2008, 01:08 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-21-2008, 01:10 AM by sovereign.)
#53
Member
Posts: 3,893
Threads: 38
Joined: Feb 2008

Pay us a visit sometime, will you? Most of these ***PATHETIC HUMANS*** don't put up any real resistance. We do so enjoy dancing. We can re-open the candy store in Omega-58 if you'll take us out for pancakes now and then.

[Image: wildLogo3.png]

[Image: SCRAgenderheuristics.png]
  Reply  
Offline kingvaillant
12-21-2008, 02:46 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-21-2008, 02:47 AM by kingvaillant.)
#54
Member
Posts: 2,961
Threads: 207
Joined: Aug 2007

The LSF is fully hostile toward the order.

Any Order (BS included) entering Liberty, Alaska or any liberty guard systems will face the extremely epic brutality of the LSF.

((of course, we are fully open to RP you know))

as for the LN, the stance is mainly identical

we have been at war, but regarding how things turned lately, the word "war" is a tad "too much"

Director of the Liberty Security Force: Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity
[Image: f_48123637838m_812390c.png]
The Amundsen Zone-21 Restrictions
  Reply  
Offline Heartless
12-21-2008, 03:53 AM,
#55
Member
Posts: 1,529
Threads: 107
Joined: Nov 2007

Tenacity- that xeno treaty only counts towards Bs| fighters and bombers

kingvailant- I think that "war" as you said is a bit too much, I would consider us hostile, definitely, but after the sp campaign the Order stopped it's "terrorist" attacks and I guess went into more silent operations?

war I would consider with are the nomads (duuh) and the bounty hunters as they want control of the Omicrons.

[Image: Cg7QQEd.png]
[Image: 14jn684.jpg]
SwissScorch --> Heartless
Reply  
Offline AdamantineFist
12-21-2008, 06:16 AM,
#56
Member
Posts: 2,177
Threads: 28
Joined: Feb 2008

' Wrote:Tenacity- that xeno treaty only counts towards Bs| fighters and bombers
I believe they mentioned that other Order fighters were to be considered friendly as well.

[Image: FistShroom.png][Image: OORPShroom.png][Image: bowexbar.jpg][Image: RheinlandShroom.png][Image: BretoniaShroom.png]
[Image: adacopieky9.png]
[Image: frcl.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Heartless
12-21-2008, 06:25 AM,
#57
Member
Posts: 1,529
Threads: 107
Joined: Nov 2007

oh, well idk. All I know is that from our standpoint Bs| is allowed to dock fighters and bombers on xeno bases.

Note, Wolfpack and I are re-doing the diplomatic stuff but I don't think that treaty will get changed or revoked but we'll see.

[Image: Cg7QQEd.png]
[Image: 14jn684.jpg]
SwissScorch --> Heartless
Reply  
Offline Tenacity
12-21-2008, 06:33 AM,
#58
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

I've worked with xenos (mostly XA members, but some indies) several times on my order character, with no complaints from anyone...

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Offline Dusty Lens
12-21-2008, 06:34 AM,
#59
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

Well be sure to let a body know if you change your mind. Good to know in advance if you should be shooting someone or giving them a high five.

Tenacity: The only grievance that comes to mind right off is to keep the capships off of Ouray, that's the only stipulation included in the treaty that I'd consider universally applicable.
Reply  
Offline Heartless
12-21-2008, 06:38 AM,
#60
Member
Posts: 1,529
Threads: 107
Joined: Nov 2007

will do, I'd like to keep that alliance though. It's a good staging point from which to check on liberty to see for nomad things being moved and for nomad materials in ships so we can take them.

[Image: Cg7QQEd.png]
[Image: 14jn684.jpg]
SwissScorch --> Heartless
Reply  
Pages (8): « Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode