• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 352 353 354 355 356 … 387 Next »
BAF Dunkirks

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »
BAF Dunkirks
Offline Dieter Schprokets
01-02-2009, 09:36 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-02-2009, 10:15 PM by Dieter Schprokets.)
#1
Member
Posts: 4,394
Threads: 662
Joined: Jul 2007

We have several Dunkirk bases:

the Essex, the Suffolk, the Norfolk, the York, the Derby, the Macduff, the Grimsby, and the Arc Royal.

What if BAF Members of Captain rank or above were assigned their own, and normally based out of their Dunkirk, and had some responsibility for that area?

Bluntpencil gets one too.

Maybe the Fleet Admiral only gets the Pendragon, and rebases it on occasion, depending on need?

Silly idea or good one?

Who wants which one, if a good idea?

More active players should get ones closer to the front line. ie, Blunt at the Derby, MarvinCZ at the Norfolk..

Less Active players (Stratus, no offense), maybe the "safer" Stratus gets the one in Salisbury, maybe? The Harlow?

(BTW, Bribe the Fleet Admiral..:))

[Image: siggy.jpg]
Reply  
Offline guitarguy
01-02-2009, 11:44 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 429
Threads: 30
Joined: Nov 2008

It might help to assign everyone to a system/battleship area to manage the large BAF membership. For example: MarvinCZ gets a "squadron" of player fighters and bombers assigned to him, that primarily patrols around the Norfolk, and sticks together in large events.

On the other hand, micromanaging will be complicated.:(

[Image: dfcz.png][Image: frcl.png][Image: dscz.jpg][Image: 19979982.jpg]
[Image: u3cld.jpg]
| BAF Faction Information | BAF War Bonds | BAF Training Program | BAF Combat Training Manual |
  Reply  
Offline Koolmo
01-02-2009, 11:55 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 1,662
Threads: 65
Joined: Sep 2006

Wouldn't mind the privateers being officially based off the Derby, although most of our operations start out of tau 23.

<span style="color:#FFFF00">&quot;General Solo, is your strike team assembled?&quot;
&quot;Barely, they're pretty drunk.&quot;
</span>
SCRA Recruiting--SCRA Feedback--SCRA Message Dump--SCRA Faction Status
Jack Handey Wrote:I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.
  Reply  
Offline Dieter Schprokets
01-03-2009, 12:00 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 4,394
Threads: 662
Joined: Jul 2007

Was just going to do the above.

Assigning to squadrons doesnt work well.

SF did that.

[Image: siggy.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Koolmo
01-03-2009, 12:08 AM,
#5
Member
Posts: 1,662
Threads: 65
Joined: Sep 2006

Yea, but most players in SF had a ship in each squadron too, and we could always move between, if we felt there was the need. My cruiser was technically based out of cam, to fight off corsairs, but it got all the way up to tau 31 a few times.

<span style="color:#FFFF00">&quot;General Solo, is your strike team assembled?&quot;
&quot;Barely, they're pretty drunk.&quot;
</span>
SCRA Recruiting--SCRA Feedback--SCRA Message Dump--SCRA Faction Status
Jack Handey Wrote:I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.
  Reply  
Offline Drake
01-03-2009, 12:15 AM,
#6
Member
Posts: 2,195
Threads: 93
Joined: Jun 2007

I have to agree with Mr. Schrokets on both counts. Assigning Dunkirks to the various NPC battleships would be cool, but trying to divide up all the BAF characters by Dunkirk is going a bit too far, and it's unnecessary.
Reply  
Offline Dieter Schprokets
01-03-2009, 01:30 AM,
#7
Member
Posts: 4,394
Threads: 662
Joined: Jul 2007

' Wrote:I have to agree with Mr. Schrokets on both counts. Assigning Dunkirks to the various NPC battleships would be cool, but trying to divide up all the BAF characters by Dunkirk is going a bit too far, and it's unnecessary.

Right.

I'm thinking more of an RP device, and a source of pride for the member, ie

"Admiral McKenna, once you return to your command on the Norfolk, I ask you muster the Fleet there."

[Image: siggy.jpg]
Reply  
Offline guitarguy
01-03-2009, 01:38 AM,
#8
Member
Posts: 429
Threads: 30
Joined: Nov 2008

I see what you mean.

[Image: dfcz.png][Image: frcl.png][Image: dscz.jpg][Image: 19979982.jpg]
[Image: u3cld.jpg]
| BAF Faction Information | BAF War Bonds | BAF Training Program | BAF Combat Training Manual |
  Reply  
Offline Simsonator
01-03-2009, 11:56 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 167
Threads: 16
Joined: Nov 2007

I think this could be an interesting development and could enhance our gaming in the BAF, bring it on i say
  Reply  
Offline CaltuRe
01-03-2009, 12:11 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 148
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2008

Sir, never it is known from what party enemies will come and how many they will be, I think what better to leave free patrol. If will be on separateness the pilot being more close to a front line will be more skilled, and pilots being on patrol in less dangerous sites can become puzzled. As прийдеться often to throw reinforcements from one zone in another.
  Reply  
Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode