Admin Team Reinforcements

[Dennis Jameson]

Only one should be apointed in this popularity contest.

I voted for Joe since he's got more sanity than most people put together.

---

Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici

10/6

[Grumblesaur]

Brilliant!

These guys are some of the best role-players, especially Joe! I voted yes for all 3 of them, i hope they do well as server admins.

You don't have to RP to be an Admin, just well-versed on the server rules.

Marburg definitely. Joe and Dieter I don't really care.

---

A way a lone a last a loved a long the riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay,
brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.

[Grin]

Yes to Dieter and Joe, 'cos I know and respect them both.

No to Marburg as I don't know him. Would have abstained if the option had been available.

All three candidates would do well to remember, though, that absolute power corrupts absolutely! :P

---

BAF|Lt.Jay.Smith - Templar, BAF|Lt.Jay.Smith. - Challenger, HMS-Hardy - Indy Gunboat

[Dennis Jameson]

Ain't that the truth. :P

---

Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici

10/6

[Primus Avatar]

After all, people are free to make their own mistakes, but they are not free from taking the possible consequences of them.

im glad we agree

---

wassup

[skoko]

Guys guys guys.... we are discussing here about people, and their abilities. I can't see how anyone can say no because someone doesn't know some person. What is that telling about us? We let our prejudice or fears controlling our decisions. Also, judging someone about his possible future function, without seeing him/her doing it .. isn't right. Why? We have to give them chance to show us "from what are they made of". Lets see their ability to handle duties as admins, then we can make thread where we can complain about them..

On the other side, i can fully understand "no votes" which are based on personal experience while interacting with person. I had similar case when last admin voting took place. I voted no for one admin, who, of course became admin. Bad thing is i can't say if he was good admin cause he left soon after he became admin.

My point is i clicked Search button every time when there was admin voting and i read random posts in more important threads from person i was voting for. Do that read his / her posts, then make decision with facts that can support your argument... but please stop using excuse i don't know the person... I don't know any of admins, i mean i talk with few ... but i don't know them and that doesn't mean they aren't good/bad admins.... just saying.. think twice before voting.

Skoko

---

<blockquote>Was member of : [LN] [LR] [RoS] Keepers (NovaPG) [AU]

[SA]-Jake.Benson - Benson's life
Alvaro Himenez of [RoS]- Alvaro's story</blockquote>

[mjolnir]

Problem is that the "not voting" option is really missing. Now if you know someone very good and want to vote for them, while you can't decide about someone else, you can either choose to give the "unknown" guy your full support, vote no, or not vote for anyone at all.
Simply adding one more option would help a lot.

---

Igiss says: Martin, you give them a finger, they bite off your arm.

[Reverend Del]

And will be added to future polls, it seems a necessary tool.

---

Saint Del is considered a holy healer of diseases of children, but also as a protector of cattle.

[torchwood]

thourght i'd give this a bump...

---

[Athenian]

Yes to all three. Thorough gents all. Go weirdo piggie avatar!!!

---

Former member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Discovery Community Forum Rules