• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 577 578 579 580 581 … 778 Next »
Blocking Jumpgates

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (9): 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »
Thread Closed 
Blocking Jumpgates
Offline MB52
02-19-2009, 02:38 AM,
#1
Member
Posts: 1,973
Threads: 130
Joined: Dec 2007

Ever since the decision to ban all capships from destroying any smugglers, my dreadnought has been more or less useless. Stopping unauthorized traffic through Z21 was my primary job and now I can't do that properly anymore.

So I've been thinking of ways to stop traffic without firing. The biggest thing is blocking the jumpgate.

First way I discovered by accident, where while docking the dread got jammed in the gate and was stuck there with the gate activated. No one could pass, no matter what, until I decided to cancel the jump. Only problem with this is, it is incredibly hard to re-create.

But is it allowed? does an open jumpgate lag the server at all?


Another option is more simple and involves parking in front of the gate so nothing can get through. The gate will still activate but ships can't pass you. (Well they can, but if they do they violate server rules, since nothing can pass, not even a fighter without ramming the capship out of the way)

Quote:5.4 Intentional ramming of capital ships (gunboat-class or larger) by fighters and other capital ships is not allowed in PvP combat, as well as in any other situations.

But is this fair?


Are there any other ways to stop smugglers when we can't shoot? can we even fire CDs at them or is that a violation of server rules?

[Image: screen47uz0.jpg]


I’ll carry this flag
To the grave if I must
Because it’s flag that I love
And a flag that I trust
 
Offline tazuras
02-19-2009, 02:59 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 2,179
Threads: 69
Joined: Feb 2008

I thought you could kill them in alaska cause it is now considered a guard system.

[Image: l2gnAQh.png]
Offline MB52
02-19-2009, 03:02 AM,
#3
Member
Posts: 1,973
Threads: 130
Joined: Dec 2007

There was a recent statement by an admin claiming that is no longer the case. (There is however no official notice made regarding the issue, so no one knows what the deal is, I just assume we aren't allowed)


I’ll carry this flag
To the grave if I must
Because it’s flag that I love
And a flag that I trust
 
Offline Tenacity
02-19-2009, 03:45 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

I see no problem whatsoever with blocking gates when you arent authorized to use your weapons against the target.

If the smugglers want to go OORP and take advantage of the enemy's ship class in order to move their cargo without being caught, then lawfuls should be able to take any action necessary to get around that rule.

Examples:
-Blocking gates/lanes (this was done in the singleplayer campaign so we know it's not really OORP)
-Taking screenshtos of the target's cargo and creating 'blacklists' for your faction. Basically creating a kill-on-sight list for smugglers that use this rule to get around larger ships.
-Giving bats/bots to smaller ships if needed in order to take out the enemy.

etc. etc.

Personally I think this crap about not being able to fine/demand cargo from traders in cruisers and up is ridiculous, at least when pertaining to lawfuls. Smugglers need to fear the lawfuls, and being one myself I'm a bit saddened that I dont get to play games with the lawful caps anymore =/


[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Offline kingvaillant
02-19-2009, 03:59 AM,
#5
Member
Posts: 2,961
Threads: 207
Joined: Aug 2007

' Wrote:I see no problem whatsoever with blocking gates when you arent authorized to use your weapons against the target.

If the smugglers want to go OORP and take advantage of the enemy's ship class in order to move their cargo without being caught, then lawfuls should be able to take any action necessary to get around that rule.

Examples:
-Blocking gates/lanes (this was done in the singleplayer campaign so we know it's not really OORP)
-Taking screenshtos of the target's cargo and creating 'blacklists' for your faction. Basically creating a kill-on-sight list for smugglers that use this rule to get around larger ships.
-Giving bats/bots to smaller ships if needed in order to take out the enemy.

etc. etc.

Personally I think this crap about not being able to fine/demand cargo from traders in cruisers and up is ridiculous, at least when pertaining to lawfuls. Smugglers need to fear the lawfuls, and being one myself I'm a bit saddened that I dont get to play games with the lawful caps anymore =/

I share the same thoughts as you. Smuggling is very un-entertaining nowadays... I love challenge, now there is not much of it.

Director of the Liberty Security Force: Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity
[Image: f_48123637838m_812390c.png]
The Amundsen Zone-21 Restrictions
 
Offline BaconSoda
02-19-2009, 04:01 AM,
#6
Member
Posts: 3,399
Threads: 117
Joined: Feb 2008

Pirates can stop Transports in Fighters/Bombers/Gunboats, and, guess what? You can too.

So, no, this isn't kosher by my standards.

[Image: Skritt.gif]
[8:32:45 PM] Dusty Lens: Oh no, let me get that. Hello? Oh it's my grandma. She says to be roleplay.
[12:49:19 AM] Elgatodiablo: You know its nice that you have all that proof and all, Bacon... but I just don't believe you.
Offline Dusty Lens
02-19-2009, 04:01 AM,
#7
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

' Wrote:Personally I think this crap about not being able to fine/demand cargo from traders in cruisers and up is ridiculous, at least when pertaining to lawfuls. Smugglers need to fear the lawfuls, and being one myself I'm a bit saddened that I dont get to play games with the lawful caps anymore =/

Have whine will travel I guess.

I hear you, I left the BLS after I found myself tabbing out to chat on skype while flying with my umpteenth load of slaves.

Tried the LPI to rabble up some anti-smuggler action, but got bogged down in the perpetual fighting.

Boo.
Offline kindred
02-19-2009, 04:11 AM,
#8
Member
Posts: 1,699
Threads: 9
Joined: Sep 2007

May a thousand bombers reign down on your dread for such dirty tactics.




Devtonia ; all-or-nothing approach to bias.
Offline MB52
02-19-2009, 04:12 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 1,973
Threads: 130
Joined: Dec 2007

How is it dirty to find a way to stop them without shooting them >.>


I’ll carry this flag
To the grave if I must
Because it’s flag that I love
And a flag that I trust
 
Offline kindred
02-19-2009, 04:13 AM, (This post was last modified: 02-19-2009, 04:20 AM by kindred.)
#10
Member
Posts: 1,699
Threads: 9
Joined: Sep 2007

If you can't kill them then get out of their way or get into a ship that can kill them.
Your tactic is nothing but a annoyance to others you can not touch.
Furthermore i call it a dirty tactic because you are forcing them into a trap where they
will break the rules to get you out of the way to proceed merrily along on their way.
The unlawfuls do just fine against trading vessels without cruisers and battleships.




Devtonia ; all-or-nothing approach to bias.
Pages (9): 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode