• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 527 528 529 530 531 … 547 Next »
Discovery 4.82 Beta features, bugs & suggestions

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (47): « Previous 1 … 28 29 30 31 32 … 47 Next »
Thread Closed 
Discovery 4.82 Beta features, bugs & suggestions
Offline KiraYamato
12-15-2006, 03:14 PM,
#291
Member
Posts: 16
Threads: 2
Joined: Dec 2006

' Wrote:No that happens on all gas miners you should not dock on them in the first place.... And for the detroit muinitions bug we knew about that but thank you anyways.


Rofl and why is that? I still think it's a bug.
Offline Igiss
12-15-2006, 03:19 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-15-2006, 03:19 PM by Igiss.)
#292
Discovery Creator
Posts: 3,181
Threads: 578
Joined: Jun 2005

It's an original game bug. Large ships were not supposed to dock with these stations (with any stations actually), and docking points are located in places that cause ships to get stuck. Difficult to change this.

As for miners, that's also original game flaw. There are known ways to fix them, like removing them all or "connecting" to some other station, but I'm seeking for something better. For now: avoid them.
Offline Malaclypse 666
12-15-2006, 03:24 PM,
#293
Member
Posts: 3,634
Threads: 87
Joined: Sep 2006

A question regarding "commodities";

Would it be easiest to create "new" commodities (on or two to fit each faction's RP) or just to rename some of the less popular "old" commodities?)

(We may consider charging for Principia's and Entheo-spiritual augmentation.)

[Image: malsig_alt1.png]
 
Offline majkp
12-15-2006, 04:04 PM,
#294
Member
Posts: 1,437
Threads: 133
Joined: Aug 2006

' Wrote:Suggestion time:

Could we please have a class 8/9 version of the EMP missile launcher.

And could we have EMP Mines too? They would take fighters shield down (e.g. shield damage 15000) and would do no big damage to hull.

That would make PvPs more interesting.
Offline romer
12-15-2006, 04:21 PM,
#295
Member
Posts: 407
Threads: 1
Joined: Mar 2006

A shield buster mine...sounds like a good idea.

That'd make for something useful to mount on that second mine slot that the Spatial has. That thing is starting to grow on me....

What is the purpose of that thing having two mine droppers anyway?

[Image: 1c7e8191.jpg]
 
Offline marauder
12-15-2006, 05:14 PM,
#296
Member
Posts: 1,950
Threads: 42
Joined: Nov 2005

To bombard anyone daft enough to follow you with loads of nuke mines of course...

They can't fight if they're glowing in the dark and trying to find that stash of emergancy anti-radiation pills now can they?

Speaking of the spatial, it's hitbox seems alittle off, not entirely sure, will have to have another look at nights one.
 
Offline Profile
12-15-2006, 11:32 PM,
#297
Member
Posts: 209
Threads: 26
Joined: Jun 2005

Can we erase all asteroids fields to make very large ships moving easily?

Characters

All characters have been deleted.

[Image: ugtprofile3mm.png]
 
Offline McNeo
12-16-2006, 12:38 AM,
#298
Member
Posts: 3,424
Threads: 52
Joined: Aug 2006

@Profile: That is the point of asteroid fields, so that others can run away and its hard for you to follow.
At least thats how i saw it.

I think most will say "no" to that one.

@marauder: Yeah the Spatial hitbox goes way to far off the left of the big wing (from rear view) making it a bigger target than it already is. However, with all those edges to program in.....that will take a fairly long time.

---------------------

Im all in favour of a sheildbuster mine:)
 
Offline TankTarget
12-16-2006, 01:04 AM,
#299
Member
Posts: 1,310
Threads: 34
Joined: Jun 2006

Suggestion: Weaker mines that do not use ammo but energy? Say maybe do 2500 damage for people who do not have the money to worry about using mines that chances are they may not need....Or if not for mines how about countermeasures.....
 
Offline BestFlyerHere
12-16-2006, 01:46 AM,
#300
Member
Posts: 1,409
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2006

Yes, in like flak 88 they had mines and CMs that took energy, not ammo. Makes this a lot cheaper... Specially with nuke mines.

I am a long-absent Supreme Commander, Executive Commander, Grand Admiral, Fleet Admiral, and Captain in the mighty Hellfire Legion. I have returned, and am on an urgent mission from Drake Thastus to return the Legion to its former glory, and to claim the galaxy for its own. Only then will I be able to rest.


RP Story (Still deciding whether or not to finish)

http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?sh...=5439&st=20


 
Pages (47): « Previous 1 … 28 29 30 31 32 … 47 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode