Innocence & Guilt.

[Cellulanus]

Yes or no to an or question?

WHAT?:huh:

[McNeo]

This is like a question such as;

Do you beat your wife often?

Yes (well of course no one will say this)
No (Then you get asked; You beat your wife?!)

This poll is fixed to generate only one outcome, that is the one you desire.

[n00bl3t]

This is like a question such as;

Do you beat your wife often?

Yes (well of course no one will say this)
No (Then you get asked; You beat your wife?!)

This poll is fixed to generate only one outcome, that is the one you desire.

The choice is there. It has been used.

I am just asking what you think of when a punishment should be administered, nothing else.

I do not have the option to jump at someone with a surprise question because they answered "incorrectly" in this thread.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Eppy]

Who in God's name voted Yes?

EDIT: SEE? I KILLED THIS THREAD, TOO. DEAR GOD, I'M A MURDERER.

---

Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen

Which Dreadnought was that?

One of your nine.

[n00bl3t]

Who in God's name voted Yes?

EDIT: SEE? I KILLED THIS THREAD, TOO. DEAR GOD, I'M A MURDERER.

Why did you have to post Eppy?:P

I wish people who voted yes explained their vote. (I would not mind people who voted no also expressing why they feel this should be the case.)

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[swift]

Well of course.
In general, people should be considered innocent until proven guilty. There's no doubt about that, and I'm sure everyone else agrees.
I look forward to seeing what this is really about.

I don't know what the real question is, but if it's something about sanctions, aren't they already done only if the evidence is incontrovertible?

---

<span style="font-familyalatino Linotype">

<span style="color:#000000">All morons hate it when you call them a moron.

</span></span>

<span style="color:#33FFFF">The CFF</span>

<span style="color:#33FF33">CFF Communication Channel and RP Collection</span>

[atlantis2112]

Innocent until caught.

&

Guilty after proved

[Tomtomrawr]

You would need evidence to punish someone, how can you punish someone of something that can not be proven they did.

---

[17:45:39] Wolfs Ghost (Murphy): Tom, you have problems. Go kill yourself.
[19:25:12] Johnny (Jam): Tomtom, I will beat you with a spoon.
[14:22:56] Prarabdh Thakur: KILL HIM WITH A SHEEP.
[17:40:48] Eagle (Junes): Tom should be slapped with a spoon.
[11:32:18] Warspite: Thank you for being so awesome Tom. &lt;3
[18:17:36] Metano: I love you tomtom
[20:06:24] Warspite: I will seriously give you epic head.

Edit: also, Tomtomrawr, fappin' like a boss.

[Jinx]

if it applies to disco - the question should rather be...

guilty after a one sided description of an incident - or only guilty after both sides had their say.

other than that - guilty before proven is what we do daily on the forum ( trials by forum, labelling groups of players and spreading rumor )

---

Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC

[William Frederick Cody]

(...) Pechstein is accused of doping in February 2009.

International Skating Unions Decision

In Claudia Pechstein's case there isnt any positive doping test.

So in some cases...yes

---

Idiocy and blind spots. Hidden features for veteran players. Inform yourself here|Codenames and their locations

[url=http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=17248]SpacePics|False Friends|Tom Waits|Die Ärzte|Awful German Language|Cody's feedback thread|Cody' job board