• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 372 373 374 375 376 547 Next »
Question to the Admins.

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Question to the Admins.
Guest
08-24-2009, 12:48 PM,
#1
Unregistered
 

So, recently I was told, that Cannon said, that [RA] docking on Malta cannot be counted as OORP docking.








Why not?








They are Exiled by most of the factions in Alpha, shot by every outcast and their dog, they are shooting allies, openly shooting Smugglers in Tau 37, engaging 101st on sight.

Now how the hell docking on Malta wouldn't be OORP?

It would be like me taking a BHG to Gamma, murdering everyone and then docking on Crete.




I really wish the Admins would review this, because this is not really logical. They are abusing their ID to escape PVP in Alpha simply by docking on Malta every time.


The Exile of RA is right there in the Forum Diplomacy section, it has been RPed out.


Maybe give us a reason why can't these actions be considered as OORP docking and therefore be reportable.
Reply  
Offline Unholy1
08-24-2009, 12:51 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 339
Threads: 12
Joined: Jun 2008

Couldn't of said it better myself Sindy.

[Image: Picaro.png]
Quote: Dusty Lens- Oops I did it again. I posted in flood. Got lost in the game. Oh, baby; baby.
  Reply  
Offline Soul Reaper
08-24-2009, 12:52 PM,
#3
Banned
Posts: 1,502
Threads: 108
Joined: Jan 2009

Yep, hunt em down, till they're sick of it,

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=114477
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline swift
08-24-2009, 01:02 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-24-2009, 01:07 PM by swift.)
#4
Member
Posts: 2,838
Threads: 61
Joined: Jul 2008

I'm not really going to join the apparent [RA] witch hunt that seems to be going on, no matter what their qualities, or lack thereof might be, but I do agree that if it was RPed by the official factions of the Outcasts and the Council of Dons, it's what's to happen.

I remember the part about Official Faction Rights, something about faction diplomacy etc.
I'll try and get a quote.

This one might fit the bill:

Quote:RIGHT 2) Official factions have authority over players of the same NPC affiliation, as long as RP justification is provided. This authority applies in forums and in-game, and applies to player faction diplomacy, and strategic and tactical direction. However, exercise of that authority, on the forums and in game, is restricted to official faction members with the rank of the official faction leader and one rank below him/her. The authority may be exercised through the use of in-game in-RP orders, which, if not obeyed, can result in in-game in-RP consequences (arrest, court martial, and even lethal force in extreme circumstances). Official Factions cannot, under any cicrumstances, require another player to follow non-canon RP if that player doesn't want to.

Was RP justification given? Was it RPed out? Were the aforementioned group damaging the diplomacy and standing of the Outcasts as a whole and the official factions used their power within reason and logically?

Yes throughout.

<span style="font-familyTonguealatino Linotype">
<span style="color:#000000">All morons hate it when you call them a moron.
</span></span>
<span style="color:#33FFFF">The CFF</span>
<span style="color:#33FF33">CFF Communication Channel and RP Collection</span>
  Reply  
Offline Jinx
08-24-2009, 01:05 PM,
#5
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

i think it was something along the lines that official factions have the right to enforce canon RP ( as opposed to enforce non-canon RP, which they are not allowed )

but really - can t it be handled in PMs ... or if you must in sanction reports? - and if the sanction reports are not followed by a sanction, you certainly know that it was no "sanctionable" incident. - rather easy.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline McNeo
08-24-2009, 01:10 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-24-2009, 01:10 PM by McNeo.)
#6
Member
Posts: 3,424
Threads: 52
Joined: Aug 2006

If they have an Outcast ID and an Outcast tag, then they cannot be prevented by the rules from docking on Malta. This case with the RA looks similar to the case with the HAF, in which you couldn't stop the HAF from docking on Crete. In this case, the issue was 'solved with sanction reports', as Jinx suggested above. Im not sure if you want to disregard the lessons of history and go down that road too.
  Reply  
Offline swift
08-24-2009, 01:10 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 2,838
Threads: 61
Joined: Jul 2008

Yeah, I believe you're right, Jinx.
And I'd say it was canon RP to have the Outcast leadership shun away those who'd jeopardize their alliances with the Liberty Rogues and the Lane Hackers.
Actions have consequences, and if I, for example, had an unofficial player group with Liberty Navy IDs, and say, flew capital fleets into Kusari, harassed Bretonian citizens, or you name it, without of course breaking rules, the Libertonian powers would be fully in their right to .. eh, "take care of the problem".

Anyways, I just ask everyone that this thread doesn't turn into a flame the [RA] one, because that would be immature and well, unfair to them, no matter what you might think about them.

<span style="font-familyTonguealatino Linotype">
<span style="color:#000000">All morons hate it when you call them a moron.
</span></span>
<span style="color:#33FFFF">The CFF</span>
<span style="color:#33FF33">CFF Communication Channel and RP Collection</span>
  Reply  
Guest
08-24-2009, 01:47 PM,
#8
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:Yeah, I believe you're right, Jinx.
And I'd say it was canon RP to have the Outcast leadership shun away those who'd jeopardize their alliances with the Liberty Rogues and the Lane Hackers.
Actions have consequences, and if I, for example, had an unofficial player group with Liberty Navy IDs, and say, flew capital fleets into Kusari, harassed Bretonian citizens, or you name it, without of course breaking rules, the Libertonian powers would be fully in their right to .. eh, "take care of the problem".

Anyways, I just ask everyone that this thread doesn't turn into a flame the [RA] one, because that would be immature and well, unfair to them, no matter what you might think about them.

Indeed, It was never made to be a rock throwing thread, I ams imply wondering, what caused such an odd decision given the actions of the group.
Reply  
Offline Linkus
08-24-2009, 01:53 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 155
Joined: Mar 2008

The [RA] are shooting everyone and anyone that they want, regardless of alliances or any previous roleplay.

It's like the Outcasts coming in and blasting away at the Rogues. Actually..that's exactly what they did.


Do what happened with Weedalot. Rephax. They are harming general server gameplay as is plain to see, that is more worthy of a sanction than any F1.





Facilitating the rise of robotics since 0 A.D.
  Reply  
Offline Altaris
08-24-2009, 02:01 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 780
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2008

Officials have authority yes, but i dont think we are able to forbid someone to dock. I think that is only admin's right. Although i still agree with Sindy.

[Image: 101st-banner-captain.png]
Carnage itself flying within void...
Proud cardihead ever since 2008...
You all gonna eat cardi!
...also im a troll, so hate me.
  Reply  
Pages (6): 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode