• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum Discovery Unofficial Development Discovery Mod Content Submissions
« Previous 1 … 20 21 22 23 24 … 28 Next »
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision
Offline Jinx
08-25-2009, 12:51 PM,
#1
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

[Image: bretonianctransport3.png]
here it is - i do hope its now bretonian enough . - i attached an image of the ship without its cargopods to show that its not as hopelessly fat as it might appear... .but actually quite skinny.

the cheesy coloured bretonian insignia are "glow in the dark" ones ( faintly ) - they d look different ingame.

*thats a new thread cause i couldn t find the old one in a hurry.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline 11of10
08-25-2009, 12:52 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 675
Threads: 21
Joined: Feb 2009

Would it be able to change cargo pods as generic trains do?

Quote:Be excelent to each other!
  Reply  
Offline Jinx
08-25-2009, 12:54 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-25-2009, 12:55 PM by Jinx.)
#3
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

afraid not - they ll be mounted fixed and they ll also extend the hitbox. - may sound unfair, but since cargopods are not added as your cargo increases and your cargo is not lost when you loose a cargopod .... they are rather useless in a whole.

the pods will be part of the ship.

besides - without the pods - its just a fat head with a slight spine.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline reavengitair
08-25-2009, 12:57 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 3,399
Threads: 108
Joined: Dec 2008

Now THATS container transport!

Great job, however, I for one would like it a little longer... unless...

Anyway, any size comparison to the Kusari container transport? (btw, the kusari container transport doesn't even look kusarian... needs reeedoooo!)
  Reply  
Offline Andrew_Bonesovich
08-25-2009, 01:09 PM,
#5
Member
Posts: 412
Threads: 11
Joined: Dec 2008

I like the current Shire and I dont understand why it needs replace but this looks nice. Its a shame that the cargo pods cant be made changeable, but its for a good reason. Without them it would be tiny.

A criminal always returns to the crime scene.
Reply  
Offline teschy
08-25-2009, 01:18 PM,
#6
20yrs & I Only Got This Title
Posts: 2,471
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2007

That's great, but can you remake the Mammoth, or model a new 3000 Liberty transport too? The current one looks like it's unfinished, it's pretty awful..
Reply  
Offline 11of10
08-25-2009, 01:24 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 675
Threads: 21
Joined: Feb 2009

Basically, it's pretty similar to the current Shire model, except for the pincer tail, and cranes above, which is a detail I particularily like. Personally, I liked the one before (the silver one, I have a picture saved on my hard drive) better. But that's just me.

Quote:Be excelent to each other!
  Reply  
Offline Montezuma/Kukulcan
08-25-2009, 01:28 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-25-2009, 01:29 PM by Montezuma/Kukulcan.)
#8
Member
Posts: 1,691
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2009

Please leave the shire alone, it is already good looking, and a beast in combat, i see no reason why it needs any sort of revision.

Why would you fix something that isnt broken?

[Image: montezuma1.png]
  Reply  
Offline reavengitair
08-25-2009, 01:31 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 3,399
Threads: 108
Joined: Dec 2008

Even though most people love the current shire, I really don't think it looks too much like a container transport... I've always imagined that they all look somewhat like the Kusari one... lots of cargo pods sticking outside...

However, thats just me. I prefer this new one, probably better if the cargo pods could get a different texture.
  Reply  
Offline SevereTrinity
08-25-2009, 01:33 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-25-2009, 01:34 PM by SevereTrinity.)
#10
Member
Posts: 1,152
Threads: 28
Joined: Apr 2008

Don't try and fix something that isn't broken. Fix the things that need fixed.
Reply  
Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode