Quote: secondly, if you want any other interaction than shooting, just stop when you see a message containing stop/halt/cut your engines/etc and your name in it. its hard to scan your cargo and make a demand if someone is 3k away from you and you need to dodge mines and asteroids. also - let me ask you: do you stop when a military/police character tells you to? you do. and after that you can roleplay with him.
if you DONT stop when i ask you to, i tend to shoot you more after i catch you. if you dont TALK when i stop you, i dont have a reason to try to rp with you, do i?
*Coughs* Police generally don't want to rob you of all your belongings. Regardless, You should EXPECT people to be stubborn. No one wants to get robbed and they definitely won't cut their engines when you have no chance of catching them. I just wanted to clarify that before you began using that as an excuse and what not.
' Wrote:Notice the bold part. Simply telling saying "Cut your engines, gringo, before I haven't started fire" doesn't meet the minimum RP requirements of this server. Stop the trader and RP with him further, if he doens't comply then you can burn him to an inch of his life.
Trader doesn't stops, so I tell next sentence somewhat like: "Ah, so I must clear my thought with guns, your choice" And after this sentnece minimum rp was done. Pointless people, simply pointless to search flaws in ohers peeps post in order to gain ability to flame him.
And I'm sure Sails does this. This is regulated by black sails code.
And peeps who are just angry becouse someone took a share of their profits and searchs for any way to bash the pirates who pirated him is immature, if you ask me. But if you are going to flame, please provoide decent screenshoots showing so, if you don't have any proofs backing up your statements I think you can be concidered just a simple flamer who is pouring his pique in such childish way.
Quote:It is not against RP to TRY to run away from the person attacking you, if you think so, tell me how; all I see is that you get POed that you lost someone to Pirate.
Shows how much you care about other people's expierence. As a pirate I want to dedicate my attention to rp quality instead of cheking and constantly watching if the guy is not about just to runaway at the moment I will be typing rp lines.
YOu know how frustrating can that be? ... you write 2 sentences, concider me not such a fast typer. I see a transport moving twardwards tradelane. "escape" press escape and then make sure TL is cut off. Guess what, my lines were disabled and I need to re-do it again, same as earlier I need to watch you not to move.
This is not a rule discussion thread.
I'm not interested by how to pirate since there is no proof or even description of anything we did wrong.
Stop posting here about it or I'll ask moderators to make all these posts get hide. I'm all for discussions about our failures in piracy or such things, but bring evidences, context description, like you would do to report a rule violation to the admins.
Thx.
' Wrote:we killed him for blood diamond smuggling. simple as that.
In fact not, but I may remind where the junker congress is in our reputation sheet. My character is also one you may not call "baffoon" that fast, you could regret it;)
How come Grimly agreed to the Council's rules then?
Since that was a clear violation there.
I mean, I get what you mean, I'ld shoot anyone who's against Corsairs and supports Hessians. If you want to play on both sides you better have a good excuse.
But that doesn't change the fact that Corsair council set the rules and noone opposed. I would have opposed to that then.
This way it seems, especially from Junker's report to Court that you've wronged him seriously.
Edit: It's more of a general critique to things, and posting it here gets your opinions on the matter, so it's good.
' Wrote:How come Grimly agreed to the Council's rules then?
Since that was a clear violation there.
I mean, I get what you mean, I'ld shoot anyone who's against Corsairs and supports Hessians. If you want to play on both sides you better have a good excuse.
But that doesn't change the fact that Corsair council set the rules and noone opposed. I would have opposed to that then.
This way it seems, especially from Junker's report to Court that you've wronged him seriously.
Edit: It's more of a general critique to things, and posting it here gets your opinions on the matter, so it's good.
as with coins, so precious to the junkers, there are two sides to each story. we respect the corsair laws at all times, and in case someone manages to violate them, he must either accept his punishment or leave the roster.
if the corsair court wishes to punish me for destroying the junker, so be it. but bare in mind i will not play the role of a silent accused.
' Wrote:How come Grimly agreed to the Council's rules then?
Since that was a clear violation there.
I mean, I get what you mean, I'ld shoot anyone who's against Corsairs and supports Hessians. If you want to play on both sides you better have a good excuse.
But that doesn't change the fact that Corsair council set the rules and noone opposed. I would have opposed to that then.
This way it seems, especially from Junker's report to Court that you've wronged him seriously.
Edit: It's more of a general critique to things, and posting it here gets your opinions on the matter, so it's good.
Ivan. I agreed them. But as each of us, we have our own interpretation of these rules.
It was never declared at all the junker congress was even neutral to the corsair nation, while on the other hand, we declared our hostility to them even if my orders aren't to be followed by other corsairs.
I played with the failures of the corsair system:D