• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 268 269 270 271 272 … 547 Next »
(THE MODEL DUMP)

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (16): « Previous 1 … 10 11 12 13 14 … 16 Next »
(THE MODEL DUMP)
Offline schlurbi
03-28-2010, 07:55 PM,
#111
Member
Posts: 4,688
Threads: 187
Joined: Apr 2009

How come that fits more into Freelancer than your Transport?

[Image: 6600075_bg.jpg]

I pretty much agree with everything that Frozen said. Oh yeah, and I guess you already know what People think about your Lane Hacker Gunboat since I have linked you to the Opinions in the Past.

"Who is it doing this synthetic type of alpha beta psychedelic funkin'?"
[Image: Newgoldensigfinishawesomecoolcolours.png]
  Reply  
Offline Luis
03-28-2010, 09:13 PM,
#112
Member
Posts: 1,964
Threads: 178
Joined: Mar 2009

' Wrote:
How come that fits more into Freelancer than your Transport?

[Image: 6600075_bg.jpg]

I pretty much agree with everything that Frozen said. Oh yeah, and I guess you already know what People think about your Lane Hacker Gunboat since I have linked you to the Opinions in the Past.


I wantt that ship!

It looks better and more detailed than the LH Transport! XD

Me wantz one!!

I luv u shlurbi, Keep it up!
  Reply  
Offline hribek
03-28-2010, 09:21 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-28-2010, 09:29 PM by hribek.)
#113
Member
Posts: 1,159
Threads: 61
Joined: Dec 2007

Well, the thing is - people have been buying the lane hacker gunship historically because they liked the looks, even though it was relatively underpowered in stats.

Frozen was right but he was also wrong. Being way too impolite is not very useful. Now, if we just ignore the excessive hatred originating from who-knows-where ...

To be honest, I would like there to be a lane hacker assault transport - or at least a sared outcast-hacker looking design, so that we could stop using the rather sturdy and unfitting pirate transport.

On the other hand, it would be irresponsible to make a compromise between having a ship and having a ship that fits. The model looks nice, artistically (I think). But if I want to fit it into the Freelancer universe, I have to close a significant fraction of my two eyes.

It could use a paint job. The general shape is relatively fine, but that doesn't mean it has to remain that way.

Mouth Shot, I did not appreciate your post, usefulness of which is debatable.
Reply  
Offline Durandal
03-29-2010, 04:15 AM,
#114
Member
Posts: 5,106
Threads: 264
Joined: Apr 2009

' Wrote:Now, if we just ignore the excessive hatred originating from who-knows-where ...

Well I mean, to be honest.. if I were told my LF and bomber were to be replaced with no prior consultation beforehand, I'd be pretty irked too Hribek.

In any case, yes, freelancer ships are boxy, but boxy doesn't have to equate to ugly - Terran capital ships from Freespace are a prime example, particularly enhanced with the media VPs the community has created.

The point is that the model doesn't fit into freelancer in any way, shape or form. The textures need to be darker and gritter, and the model should be more sharp and harsh looking.

My two cents.

Also, you mentioned "admins were fine with it and everything". Admins are not devs. You should've talked to Igiss and Frozen ahead of time about it, at least the second time around.
Reply  
Offline dude42
04-09-2010, 08:54 PM,
#115
Member
Posts: 155
Threads: 16
Joined: Nov 2006

have you ever tried to frame up a wall. Like, nailing togeteher 2by sixes and standing it up in place ect.
Have you ever had a rendneck drinking a beer behind you, telling how do it, "OH you should bla bla and
if you dont bla bla then it aint gunna bla bla.
But that beer drinking red neck has never done it himself and wont help you, just tell you how he would
have done it.

You getting my jist here?
This is MY THREAD, I started for MY MODELS. You should be here to talk about technicals but all I get "mostly"
is complaints about what ship might be replaced and also how my ships are not like you would make them
if you could/did. I have to make it clear again children, I DONT HAVE AUTHORETY TO REPLACE SHIPS!
I am just making models, wheather or not they get use is no beef of mine.

And Guess what, your not the gatekeepers of what gets in and what does not so stop acting like it.
The submition of these models have nothing to do with you guys, I am trying to envolve you in the creation
so that you get some say in its look before it MIGHT be taken.
So please start playing your part as a contributer and not a Flaming Prick'

Thanks Hribek for giving some actual "Constructive Critizism" I agree that the skins are a bit too bizy.
But alas Hribek, Do to the fact that the modders for this game are also Gamers and there for too appithetic
to actually "get off thier asses" and finish it. I know Moriarty has been chomp'in at the bit to get this trans but
I have handed it over to several modders to finish and haven't got so much as a simply reply from any.
  Reply  
Offline Linkus
04-10-2010, 12:45 AM, (This post was last modified: 04-10-2010, 12:47 AM by Linkus.)
#116
Member
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 155
Joined: Mar 2008

Most of the other modellers in Discovery are too busy working with new stations for 4.86. Ships aren't at all a priority right now.
Also, people can get pretty sick of finishing other people's models for them.
Finish them yourself.


Oddly, the community IS who decides whether a ship ought to be replaced, since it's the community who use it and see it every day. Faction opinions obviously have priority if it's their ship that it involves.

The people of Discovery choose how their ships should look like. So they have every right to say how they would change it, it's called criticism.


So all in all:
Stop being an ass.
Listen to what people say when they go 'I don't like it'. If a lot say that, it's a sign.
Finish your models yourself, other people have priorities that may not involve you.

PS, the model looks grand, a bit boring and the textures are god awful.
Re-texture it with FL textures and maybe make it look less...closed up really. It just gives off the impression of 'blank'.





Facilitating the rise of robotics since 0 A.D.
  Reply  
Offline dude42
04-20-2010, 01:20 PM,
#117
Member
Posts: 155
Threads: 16
Joined: Nov 2006


[Image: LHLF%20Look.jpg]




A look at the Heavy Fighter (untextured)

[Image: LHHF%20Look.jpg]

[Image: sigdow.png]
[Image: 5447quidcardi.png][Image: 72013090.png][Image: 62928074.png][Image: 81256017.png][Image: truthojq.png]
  Reply  
Offline hribek
04-20-2010, 01:33 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-20-2010, 01:36 PM by hribek.)
#118
Member
Posts: 1,159
Threads: 61
Joined: Dec 2007

Is it possible for it to get a regular Freelancer-looking transparent glass cockpit?

Edit: The spikes on the wings and underbelly are antennae?
Reply  
Offline sovereign
04-20-2010, 04:25 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-20-2010, 04:25 PM by sovereign.)
#119
Member
Posts: 3,893
Threads: 38
Joined: Feb 2008

First impression: Eww.

Second impression: At least it's better than the transport.

Third impression: Eww.

Fourth impression: You could have just resized the LH GB and added fins and saved yourself some time.

Fifth impression: Eww.



It looks like the bastard child of a gunboat, a freighter, and a fighter, without looking right for any of them. No simple changes that I can think of squarely land it in any of those classes without making it a direct copy of something already in-game... fattening the wings makes it the LH GS down to the tee, shrinking the nose and back makes it a Dagger, and shortening the wings makes it a Camara.

It is, however, better. Perhaps play through Freelancer again, paint "Freelancer ships have hard angles" on your walls, start with a shipclass in mind, and try again...? You do have skills at this, they just need to be applied properly.



As for the "heavy fighter"... it looks more like an SHF than anything else... might find a use as a Homeworld replace, I suppose, but it looks about as far from "Lane Hacker" as I can think of without getting silly.

[Image: SCRAgenderheuristics.png]
  Reply  
Offline Korolia
04-21-2010, 12:19 AM,
#120
Member
Posts: 357
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2010

the gunship style was pretty poor, continuing it into a fighter isn't much better, tbh. Use Freelancer texture for a start, right now it makes me think of a waste disposal vehicle a bit high tech

[Image: PrincessSignaturecopy.png]
There is no bathroom!
  Reply  
Pages (16): « Previous 1 … 10 11 12 13 14 … 16 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode