• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 319 320 321 322 323 … 547 Next »
A little idea...

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Thread Closed 
A little idea...
Offline kindred
03-31-2010, 03:55 AM,
#11
Member
Posts: 1,699
Threads: 9
Joined: Sep 2007

If said script can detect singular words while leaving the same letter combination inside of a different word alone then sure, great idea.




Devtonia ; all-or-nothing approach to bias.
Offline sovereign
03-31-2010, 04:34 AM,
#12
Member
Posts: 3,893
Threads: 38
Joined: Feb 2008

Hehe, the forums for Ass-ass-in's Creed...:lol:Stupid people are stupid.
Removing stuff like that is quite difficult to work. Besides, we all know that when you're getting cussed out the other player spontaneously loses the ability to spell, so you'd either have to cover a lot of misspellings (and hit a lot of innocent stuff in the process) or let anyone with half a brain get through it, a la Runescape.
Best to leave it alone, it's the easiest thing to report.

[Image: SCRAgenderheuristics.png]
 
Offline tansytansey
03-31-2010, 04:43 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 4,099
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2008

My experience from playing games with filters is that people just find ways around them. It doesn't stop swearing at all, instead you get abbreviations, leet speak etc.

In one game I played the name of a mob was censored because it had the word prickly in it.

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.
[Image: SLRU.png]
 
Offline Sarawr!?
03-31-2010, 05:22 AM,
#14
THE LAWH
Posts: 2,311
Threads: 117
Joined: Oct 2008

I'm gonna have to say that I don't support this because, depending on the severity with which a potential filter, filters words...

I could predict that we'd soon see people near completely prevented from being obscene at all, due to a filter censoring even 'offensive' words, and not just swears...I think we can leave things the way they are.

[Image: CHI4y9i.png]
[LN] Recruitment | Rachel Baker Bio

Offline Cannon
03-31-2010, 10:20 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-31-2010, 10:22 AM by Cannon.)
#15
Ex-server monkey
Posts: 4,530
Threads: 1,161
Joined: Mar 2008

Oh you mean like a system that automatically sanctions people?

Anybody recall the drama around dropping your cargo if you F1'd/disconnected? (which wasn't even a sanction unless somebody was within 4 km of you).

It is simple enough to write a swear word filter but it is hard to write a smart one and it is next to impossible to distinguish between RP insults and OOC insults.

I'm certain if it was ever implemented somebody would post something like THIS: http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=64411. It would probably be directed at the person who took the time to implement it.

I'm not going to waste my time looking at this.

In short, this idea sucks.

Proud member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Old Avatar #2 | Old Avatar #3



Bobthemanofsteel
03-31-2010, 10:30 AM,
#16
Unregistered
 

I'd say that's a wrap.
Don't worry about the buffet, people, I'll deal with getting rid of it.
Offline ... kur nubėgo?
03-31-2010, 10:52 AM,
#17
Member
Posts: 3,019
Threads: 114
Joined: Jul 2008

What about no?
It's not your buissnes how I communicate with friends in my group chat. No harm done, no sanctions. Simple as that. It's same as placing videocamera in your room to specate for police officers or whatever if your not doing anything wrong.

What if the guy was writing it in group chat, but mixed up and it slipped to the local one? What if a person had bad day and it slipped it out? And another person who red it doesn't feels to be harmed in any way? Whats wrong with that? Damn?

Omega Pirates Guild
History of OPG | Antonio "Vilkas" Devivar
Rapur
03-31-2010, 11:13 AM,
#18
Unregistered
 

HHC server has a better solution. 3 swear words in systemchat (not sure if only in sys) and you're kicked from server for a period of time.

But yeah, Vilkas is right, it would be like damn police surveillance cameras everywhere.
Offline JohnSmith
03-31-2010, 11:57 AM,
#19
Member
Posts: 59
Threads: 2
Joined: Oct 2009

Think of the kids, those sweet innocent kids so cute and perky untarnished by the reality of life. I support going a step further and removing any type of communication in game. It is the only reasonable way to protect the kids without fault.
 
Offline Fletcher
03-31-2010, 12:00 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-31-2010, 12:01 PM by Fletcher.)
#20
Member
Posts: 5,473
Threads: 952
Joined: Apr 2008

EDIT: My post is redundant, I should have looked at Cannon's own reply first.

[Image: 7220a57d19cexl1.jpg]
"Oh chuffing blimey, another day, another person being whiney!"
Fletcher's Feedback and Stories Thread
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode