• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 311 312 313 314 315 … 547 Next »
Enterprise class Liberty Carrier

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Kusari Super Alloy Shipments - 292,300 / 2,000,000
LSF Arms Shipments - 48,250 / 2,000,000
LSF Munition Shipments - 62,830 / 2,000,000
Pirate Black Market Shipments - 219,450 / 1,000,000
Dragon Bounties - 5 / 10,000
KOI Bounties - 12 / 10,000
LSF Bounties - 8 / 10,000
Samura Bounties - 2 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (7): « Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Enterprise class Liberty Carrier
Offline Denelo
04-26-2010, 07:07 PM,
#51
Member
Posts: 1,816
Threads: 77
Joined: Feb 2007

' Wrote:It's not like capital ships are made to go in asteroid fields in the first place anyhow, isn't it? Not a concern for me.

One word:

Spyglass.

Try flying one through all the fields from its purchase location to New York, using no gates.

Then it'll be a concern.

That said, it's really not much of a problem with the anti-bump thing active.

Also, please, please, whatever you do, do not submit another one of Xing's... creations. The current disaster of a Carrier we have is his.
  Reply  
Offline schlurbi
04-26-2010, 07:16 PM,
#52
Member
Posts: 4,688
Threads: 187
Joined: Apr 2009

' Wrote:Also, please, please, whatever you do, do not submit another one of Xing's... creations. The current disaster of a Carrier we have is his.
Any Reason why not? I know the current one is bad, but except the Edge on the Engine I don't see any other Problem on the newer Model.

"Who is it doing this synthetic type of alpha beta psychedelic funkin'?"
[Image: Newgoldensigfinishawesomecoolcolours.png]
  Reply  
Offline Denelo
04-26-2010, 07:22 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-26-2010, 07:22 PM by Denelo.)
#53
Member
Posts: 1,816
Threads: 77
Joined: Feb 2007

' Wrote:Any Reason why not? I know the current one is bad, but except the Edge on the Engine I don't see any other Problem on the newer Model.

Three words:

Lousy flat textures.
  Reply  
Offline jxie93
04-26-2010, 09:35 PM,
#54
Member
Posts: 3,740
Threads: 80
Joined: Sep 2009

When I read the title I thought the Enterprise Liner was going to be turned into a carrier.

[Image: jxie93.gif]
*Signature Walkthrough* | *deviantART Gallery* | *Graphics Repository*
  Reply  
Offline Korolia
04-26-2010, 11:41 PM,
#55
Member
Posts: 357
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2010

' Wrote:One word:

Spyglass.

Try flying one through all the fields from its purchase location to New York, using no gates.

Then it'll be a concern.

That said, it's really not much of a problem with the anti-bump thing active.

Also, please, please, whatever you do, do not submit another one of Xing's... creations. The current disaster of a Carrier we have is his.

Well I guess that's just one more reason the hackers shouldn't have the Spyglass in the first place. Large capital ships aren't exactly made for asteroid fields - my best representation of this suggestion would be a certain scene from Star Wars...

I might have some interesting breaking news for the carrier, later tonight.

[Image: PrincessSignaturecopy.png]
There is no bathroom!
  Reply  
Offline Denelo
04-27-2010, 12:12 AM, (This post was last modified: 04-27-2010, 12:15 AM by Denelo.)
#56
Member
Posts: 1,816
Threads: 77
Joined: Feb 2007

' Wrote:Well I guess that's just one more reason the hackers shouldn't have the Spyglass in the first place. Large capital ships aren't exactly made for asteroid fields - my best representation of this suggestion would be a certain scene from Star Wars...

Whoever said I was talking about the Hackers?

Aside from that, it's one of the few unlawful capital ships that actually has a decent reason to exist. One deeply rooted in the history of at least one major faction, I might add. Don't derail other random threads with snide remarks that other peoples' stuff should be taken away from them and they get shafted because you don't think they should have them.

My point was that the bumping thing really isn't that big a deal, especially considering the exact shape of this and the fact that, unlike the Spyglass, it really doesn't go in fields much. If we can handle the Spyglass in asteroids all the time, people can handle this ship that hardly ever goes in them just fine.

Now I'd kindly request you stop derailing the topic. If you have a legitimate point you want to make against the Spyglass other than the fact that it happens to be your enemies' most powerful (and rarely-seen) ship, make a separate topic.
  Reply  
Offline Korolia
04-27-2010, 12:44 AM,
#57
Member
Posts: 357
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2010

There's nothing cannon with the Spyglass. The only story behind it was that it was "somehow stolen from the Liberty shipyards", which is a highly ridiculous idea and implies that the Liberty Navy is a highly incompetent organization that let its top of the line vessels get stolen - just like that. A bit as if the US Navy get hijacked an air craft carrier. But worse. And then they tried to hide it in a cave.

Now my point wasn't exactly to debate on whether or not hacker should have the Spyglass or not - it merely is a result of people that keeps bringing the Spyglass as a rather poor example against the idea of "long ships".

My point stays that big ships aren't made to go in asteroid fields, and that isn't my concern. But if your -supposed- point is that it isn't a concern, then why point it out at all? Is it because you are a loyalist hacker that sees in my post an attack against your beloved faction? Because I, don't give a peanut about it.

[Image: PrincessSignaturecopy.png]
There is no bathroom!
  Reply  
Offline Akura
04-27-2010, 01:06 AM,
#58
Member
Posts: 5,367
Threads: 167
Joined: Mar 2009

Looks far too long to me, can we see a comparison next to the Dread please?

I mean, it looks really, really long... olololol Long... xD
Reply  
Offline Korolia
04-27-2010, 01:10 AM,
#59
Member
Posts: 357
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2010

Look for it in the first page, link at the bottom of my post.

[Image: PrincessSignaturecopy.png]
There is no bathroom!
  Reply  
Offline Geromix
04-27-2010, 07:18 AM,
#60
Member
Posts: 108
Threads: 1
Joined: Mar 2010


A carrier should certainly be longer and wider but this one is a bit too much.

I think the length should still be reduced to around 1.5-1.7 times the length of Lib Dred. The width is fine.

Texture is ok. As everybody said if it were a bit more brighter then it would have been better.

Overall the ship is better than other models posted here and with some more improvements it should be considered for inclusion in the mod.


[Image: UT12.png]
  Reply  
Pages (7): « Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode