• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 290 291 292 293 294 … 547 Next »
Capital Docking can be done!

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Docking on Caps
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
82.09%
55 82.09%
No
17.91%
12 17.91%
Total 67 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Thread Closed 
Capital Docking can be done!
Offline hypermauler
08-18-2010, 06:28 AM,
#41
Member
Posts: 553
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2010

What happen when the fighter inside the carrier undock while the ennemy shoot nova torpedoes or cap missiles on the docking bay? K-Boom.



[Image: signatirebycrusader.png]

<span style="color:#FF9900">The Desari's lore</span>
 
Offline tansytansey
08-18-2010, 06:59 AM,
#42
Member
Posts: 4,099
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2008

You're a little slow... Player carrier ships have existed for some time, and the bugs have mostly been worked out.

The reason we don't have it is not because it's not possible, it never has been.

I also think it's stupid, closed minded and stubborn to say "Oh, another mod already has this idea. Oh well, we can't use it then."

It's not like they've copyrighted the idea.

As long as our developers did all the coding work for it themselves, then there is nothing wrong with using such a generic idea like allowing docking on carriers.

But I'm sure the Devs have their reasons for not implimenting it. Most likely time constraints, imagine how much longer we'd have to wait for 4.86 if they had to spend months programming and debugging a playership docking tool?

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes &quot;Nighthawk&quot; Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.
[Image: SLRU.png]
 
Offline Cannon
08-18-2010, 07:04 AM,
#43
Ex-server monkey
Posts: 4,530
Threads: 1,161
Joined: Mar 2008

*points to his post*
*points to seth's post*

Proud member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Old Avatar #2 | Old Avatar #3



Offline Luis
08-18-2010, 07:08 AM,
#44
Member
Posts: 1,964
Threads: 178
Joined: Mar 2009

' Wrote:*points to his post*
*points to seth's post*

Dude, lock?

It is clearly in there, and people can read. There is nothing else to say, but have spammers. :|
 
Offline CzeReptile
08-18-2010, 07:48 AM,
#45
Member
Posts: 2,238
Threads: 89
Joined: Mar 2009

I hate the non copy part.
Also, only viable argument aside from that is the abuse prevent. I so adore players who seek every opportunity to abuse stuff to gain advantage they otherwise couldnt have.

So all this falls down on players.

[Image: n24ZouO.gif]


Offline Friday
08-18-2010, 08:03 AM,
#46
Member
Posts: 1,897
Threads: 76
Joined: Aug 2007

Ultimately - the question is this:

Is any extra fun factor the mod brings superseded by any headaches it also brings?

The main drawbacks for this mod are:

1) Fitting it into the existing rule structure - namely dock = flee = death.
Solutions?
A message announcing a dock/undock procedure could be sufficient evidence of any rule breaches. Hell, its more than what we get when ships dock/undock with bases right now.

2) Exceeding base limits in systems.
Factions will have to be prepared to sacrifice a base in overloaded systems. I am sure that a faction say, the Liberty Rogues, would be prepared to lose their dockable Destroyer in New York - in exchange for being able to FLY a dockable Destroyer into the system...

3) PvP role of Carriers and other ships. Certainly in terms of carriers - they can only pack 'light' hardpoints and anti fighter defense weaponry. IRL that is all military carriers have anyway - no heavy cannons for certain!

Ultimately - I sense that if the community gets an agreement in principle from the developers - they would be prepared to wait.

[Image: GMG_banner.png]

 
Offline JIVA
08-18-2010, 08:20 AM,
#47
Member
Posts: 380
Threads: 19
Joined: Jan 2008

since so many people appear to quote that "we don t copy stuff" thing...

care to post a link where igiss said that? - cause i really cannot remember seeing it said/written by anyone who has the authority to decide. - but i am quite tempted to consider it a self fulfilling prophecy. - if the majority believes in "we don t do what other mods do" - why not prove them right?

[Image: JIVA_Sig_zps4e7f97f1.png]
the [JIVA] group
Offline xxrockstar992xx
08-18-2010, 09:36 AM,
#48
Member
Posts: 655
Threads: 48
Joined: Jan 2008

+0

So many threads about this.

inb4lock.


[12:51:19 PM] Sean: Actually, Alex is cool, I forgot 8-)
 
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode