• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 304 305 306 307 308 … 780 Next »
Population fail @ disco

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Population fail @ disco
Offline Anonymous User
09-02-2011, 10:06 AM,
#1
Member
Posts: 2,052
Threads: 132
Joined: Nov 2009

Is it just the wiki?

or who was that hard on drugs? :lol:

RLLY?!

Manhattan! 2.1 BILLION FELLAS?!

(just a example - anyone failed hard @ almost all planets in disco)


We all know - disco is the on going of vanilla.

So please anyone find a good RP reason about this now!

Official Freelancer site:
Quote:As the capitol of the Liberty System with a population of 220 million people, Manhattan was the first human colony to be established in the year 1 A.S. Since its founding, Manhattan has served as an important hub for the conquest of Sirius as, little by little, Libertonian explorers took to the dangerous task of exploring and settling other planets and other systems in the name of Liberty's "manifest destiny." Today Manhattan is still the vital heart of Liberty, sitting at the center of a vast commercial network.
So anyone find a good RP reason how they managed to GET THAT MANY BABIES WITHIN 19 YEARS!

/serious mode on

those numbers are just ridiculous.

plz fix.


and sorry for brigin' up just now. already saw that months ago but was too lazy to say.

]
  Reply  
Offline Markus_Janus
09-02-2011, 10:08 AM,
#2
Gaijin Slayer
Posts: 1,949
Threads: 103
Joined: Jun 2008

Easy answer, there has never been a concrete decision about populations now.

Samura Omotai Zaibatsu.
[Image: qz7DdPp.png]
Reply  
Offline Enoch
09-02-2011, 10:14 AM,
#3
Member
Posts: 1,252
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2010

What 19 years are you talking about ?

(sun) (sun) (sun)
Reply  
Offline Anonymous User
09-02-2011, 10:15 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 2,052
Threads: 132
Joined: Nov 2009

' Wrote:What 19 years are you talking about ?

the 19 years between SP and now.


also - toledo is lol

18 million

order is a small organisation with (compared to other militarys) few members which are skilled like hell

18 million :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:


]
  Reply  
Offline Politus
09-02-2011, 10:15 AM,
#5
Member
Posts: 843
Threads: 47
Joined: Jan 2008

Obviously the rise in recreational use of fertility drugs has caused a bloom in child population growth, with families reaching an average of 10 kids by the year 810. Draconian birth control laws resulted in a plateau of population growth as the existing children began to mature, with many entering the workforce early. This also explains the prevalence of teenage catgirl admirals as, proportionally, the amount of teenage naval officers increased by the year 818 AS as the early births entered the workforce. I think it's AS. What's the acronym again?

edit: The catgirl part can be explained by prosthetic fashions, or something like that. I ain't no scientist.

edit2: Edited a date for more consistency.

edit3: Yes the numbers are bollocks.

edit4: You can't expect any inRP explanation to make sense in a reasonable way, pls don't kill me.:(

"Things will not calm down, Daniel Jackson. They will, in fact, calm up."
Reply  
Offline Blodo
09-02-2011, 10:31 AM,
#6
No Pilot
Posts: 2,852
Threads: 128
Joined: Jan 2008

Where are these numbers from? I remember someone in the community tried to make up arbitrary numbers for populations on planets for disco a while ago, where I disagreed with all the numbers put forward on a statistical basis (800 years and you go from 50 000 to several billion people per starship? Implies quite the unnatural birth rate). But I don't think any of those numbers ever made it into mod infocards...
  Reply  
Offline CzeReptile
09-02-2011, 10:39 AM,
#7
Member
Posts: 2,238
Threads: 89
Joined: Mar 2009

Dude, stop expecting things to match anything near reality, realism or inRP justification.

Just go on writing that outcast fleet has twelve billion million sabres with krakens. Whats stopping you?

[Image: n24ZouO.gif]


Reply  
Online jammi
09-02-2011, 10:43 AM,
#8
Badger Pilot
Posts: 6,901
Threads: 415
Joined: Aug 2007
Staff roles:
Story Dev
Economy Dev

Herp derp.

There was no population boom. That's a retcon, seeing as the original population numbers were plain ridiculous. Manhattan is supposed to be a giant planet-spanning metropolis. See how much metropolis you can fill with 220 million people. 2 billion still isn't anywhere near enough, but it would make sense for a continent sized metropolis, maybe.

If you really want to get your knickers in a twist about high populations, go have a look at Leeds.

[Image: redon.gif]
[Image: f0D5b.png][Image: O2Zu5.png][Image: IlS2I.png][Image: yNeaK.png][Image: 9zbjr.png][Image: D7RGg.png]
News article library, feedback and content requests.
Reply  
Offline Kuze
09-02-2011, 10:45 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 430
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2008

I think the only fails is the 220 million...it is just like a joke...Manhattan, capitol of Liberty "a still the vital heart of Liberty, sitting at the center of a vast commercial network." and only 220 million people...pche

[Image: uzdlytw.png]
Sketchfab - deviantART - p3d - ArtStation
Reply  
Offline Blodo
09-02-2011, 10:47 AM,
#10
No Pilot
Posts: 2,852
Threads: 128
Joined: Jan 2008

Quote:who live and work in a number of large metropolises that dot the planet's surface

Ehh... Large metropolises implies a number of them dotted around a surface, not the whole surface covered in them. It could just as well be like... 10? 220 million people would fill that up just fine, after all New York in the real world has a population of "just" 20 million.
  Reply  
Pages (5): 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode