• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 33 34 35 36 37 … 46 Next »
Admin Notice: Server testing #5

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (9): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »
Admin Notice: Server testing #5
Offline Jeremy Hunter
03-15-2011, 01:15 PM,
#21
Member
Posts: 6,094
Threads: 200
Joined: Jul 2009

Awesome.

That dock message helps!

[Image: jeremy10.png]
May you ever walk in the Light, Shizune.
Reply  
Offline Cond0r
03-15-2011, 01:19 PM,
#22
Member
Posts: 2,499
Threads: 42
Joined: Sep 2009

' Wrote:The RULE says flying. The essence of this rule is to stop people escorting their own traders. You are just making up your own interpretation because you don't like the way some people play.

My original point is that you can still use F1 as always. But I guess you won't like that either.

And yes? I have noticed that you troll all my stuff here.
so, when you see "killing people with a pistol is against the law" you would just use a rifle?:lol:

and if you believe that not agreeing with your opinion is trolling, by all means, feel free to report me. your original point was that its allowed to multibox, while its not. if you have problems understanding my posts because you dont like the way I presented them to you, feel free to contact someone else about this rule.

[17:23:05] Mini Me: pls
[17:23:06] Mini Me: gtfo
  Reply  
Offline Stuart.croll
03-15-2011, 01:20 PM,
#23
Member
Posts: 377
Threads: 41
Joined: Aug 2010

' Wrote:so, when you see "killing people with a pistol is against the law" you would just use a rifle?:lol:

and if you believe that not agreeing with your opinion is trolling, by all means, feel free to report me. your original point was that its allowed to multibox, while its not. if you have problems understanding my posts because you dont like the way I presented them to you, feel free to contact someone else about this rule.
Very eloquent. You are still wrong

[Image: TN-Rivendell-1.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Not Espi
03-15-2011, 01:21 PM,
#24
Member
Posts: 3,830
Threads: 130
Joined: Sep 2009

' Wrote:The RULE says flying. The essence of this rule is to stop people escorting their own traders. You are just making up your own interpretation because you don't like the way some people play.

My original point is that you can still use F1 as always. But I guess you won't like that either.

And yes? I have noticed that you troll all my stuff here.


its considered cheating. dont do it. period. transfering equipment? yes. cargo? no.
Reply  
Offline Waratah
03-15-2011, 01:22 PM,
#25
Banned
Posts: 1,668
Threads: 133
Joined: Aug 2009

Whats to stop someone else in your house flying a trader for you
on another PC,and giving you all the money.Is that multiboxing ??

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=91098
Time left: (Permanent)
  Reply  
Offline Jeryl
03-15-2011, 01:22 PM,
#26
Member
Posts: 120
Threads: 7
Joined: Mar 2011

' Wrote:The RULE says flying. The essence of this rule is to stop people escorting their own traders. You are just making up your own interpretation because you don't like the way some people play.

My original point is that you can still use F1 as always. But I guess you won't like that either.

And yes? I have noticed that you troll all my stuff here.
I think 'flying' here means playing the character.The character owns a ship,the ship flies.So you have 'flying the character' xD
If you think he is trolling you feel free to file a violation report or just deal with it.
@Topic: Yay! U r nice ))))

Stop it.Seriously,stop whining.Stop Q_Qing and stop trolling.Stop exaggerating things which are minor,stop whining about stuff which happens every time the blue moon appears.Stop Q_Qing because people do not comply to your wishes.This is not your personal universe where you can lord everyone around and judge people using your emotions.Think logically.Think.Just think.
I'm gone.Goodbye.
  Reply  
Offline Cond0r
03-15-2011, 01:23 PM,
#27
Member
Posts: 2,499
Threads: 42
Joined: Sep 2009

' Wrote:Very eloquent. You are still wrong
like I said, instead of saying "no u" contact someone else.

anyway, no point in continuing this debate since Im basically talking to a brick wall with a forum account.

would just like to add that the new docking message could come in very handy.

/reclines

' Wrote:I think 'flying' here means playing the character.
ah someone with common sense, thank you very much.

' Wrote:Whats to stop someone else in your house flying a trader for you
on another PC,and giving you all the money.Is that multiboxing ??
if you were serious: no, its not. that would be the same if you and I traded together and I just give you all the cash that I earn.

but I see what you did there:laugh:

so basically in that case it would depend on administration judgment.

Quote:What is not acceptable is to have two traders chugging down the lanes where we can obviously tell that one person is controlling both ships. Or someone pulling another ship across a sector, when (again) it's obvious no one is in the second ship. Or for that matter, having a trader being 'escorted' by another ship - again, where it's obvious that there's only one pilot for both ships. Any and all of these are multi-boxing, which is not allowed on our server. Other servers may (and do) have different rules on this rule.

[17:23:05] Mini Me: pls
[17:23:06] Mini Me: gtfo
  Reply  
Offline Stuart.croll
03-15-2011, 01:31 PM,
#28
Member
Posts: 377
Threads: 41
Joined: Aug 2010

' Wrote:like I said, instead of saying "no u" contact someone else.

anyway, no point in continuing this debate since Im basically talking to a brick wall with a forum account.

would just like to add that the new docking message could come in very handy.

/reclines
ah someone with common sense, thank you very much.
if you were serious: no, its not. that would be the same if you and I traded together and I just give you all the cash that I earn.

but I see what you did there:laugh:
I just bumped the last debate on the subject. Read it and try to be objective.

Oh I think there is some admin input in there too.

[Image: TN-Rivendell-1.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Cond0r
03-15-2011, 01:35 PM,
#29
Member
Posts: 2,499
Threads: 42
Joined: Sep 2009

yes, thank you for bumping that old thread to help me more easily explain my point to you.

this would be the term I was looking for:
' Wrote:trading abuse.

[17:23:05] Mini Me: pls
[17:23:06] Mini Me: gtfo
  Reply  
Offline Stuart.croll
03-15-2011, 01:36 PM,
#30
Member
Posts: 377
Threads: 41
Joined: Aug 2010

' Wrote:yes, thank you for bumping that old thread to help me more easily explain my point to you.

this would be the term I was looking for:
Which rule does that come under?

Failure of objectivity

[Image: TN-Rivendell-1.jpg]
Reply  
Pages (9): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode