FR5 only using TLAGSNET?

[Hielor]

Faction right? RP? Yeah right... Remember this thread?

A FR5 via TLAGSNET would be too much and I doubt the admin team would allow it.

Yeah, I was thinking of that thread, and also the recent "using the playerlist in-RP" one. From that thread though, it looks like the FR5s for most of those characters stuck?

[Primitive]

Vague!

Rule 6.10 ? :P

You see when you're representing some faction, and you clearly show someone what he has done to make you angry and his actions were obviously against your faction.

Then if he disobeys such thing (as docking to your bases), he is breaking 6.10 rule. So I fail to see all this tries to implement FR5 like a toy ingame.

[Not Espi]

not taking rules into consideration, it's a VERY, VERY low move.

[Daedric]

Rule 6.10 ? :P

You see when you're representing some faction, and you clearly show someone what he has done to make you angry and his actions were obviously against your faction.

Then if he disobeys such thing (as docking to your bases), he is breaking 6.10 rule. So I fail to see all this tries to implement FR5 like a toy ingame.

Ah yes. If they disobey you are free to report under 6.10.

---

Helpful Discovery Guides

Get Help Here! | Player Base Guide | Mining Guide | Trading Guide

Reputation Guide | Zoner Rep Guide

OSI Information | Join OSI! | Nichols Trade Center
OSI Bounty Board | OSI Feedback

[Hone]

As a BPA member, I've convicted people based on TLAGSNet, but I would always contact them ingame.

E.G. Your cargo requires a license, please meet me at "x" so I can scan you, ect.

If they ignored/disobeyed your ingame msgs, then I think a FR5 would be entirley acceptable there and then.
If you were unable to communicate with them, E.G. You set a trap for them, but they logged off before they got to you, then I think if you made a forum RP thread - "Trader "x" you are accused of "y" come in for questioning or be outlawed" ect. And they did not see it, then I think thats just their bad luck, they knew the risks when they smuggled.

So to sum up, I think that a TLAGSNET scan alone is not enough for a FR5, it requires roleplay along with it, ideally ingame roleplay, but I think that forum roleplay ius acceptable, if there is a good reason why ingame RP could not be had.

I think the source of the evidence is the concern only of the official faction - wether they want to admit it.

---

User was banned for: Griefing others
Time left: (Permanent)

[AeternusDoleo]

Easy enough to challenge that the TLAGSNET sensors, which are long range, were malfunctioning - and challenge the local police to disprove it. Without character to character interaction, this cannot be proven, therefor the FR5 (which would have to be requested by the official police faction) would not go through. An FR5 request must have roleplay at the basis of it - just a TLAGSNET scan is not roleplay.

TLAGSNET is a tool for the police to find smugglers and pirates lurking by the lanes - not a means for them to get so damn lazy that they never leave their bases. No fining from the donut store, LPI!:nono:

---

Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.

Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.

[kingvaillant]

Factions may only do this after they have interacted with the character in role play. Faction leaders should post reputation change requests in the Special Role Play section with a link to the forum evidence.

As highlighted in the above, the admin team will not consider FR5 requests where a player has not interacted with the law breaker. The tool was added to help polices to do their jobs, in-rp. It was not added with the intent to ease the FR5 process.

---

Director of the Liberty Security Force: Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity

The Amundsen Zone-21 Restrictions

[Cosmos]

You would consider doing this?

Burn in hell!!

---

[22:50:33] ☆ҳ̸̲Ҳ̸ҳEternal†Nightmareҳ̸̲Ҳ̸ҳ☆(illi): i cyber with leather torps (smoking)

[Hone]

Addendum; of course FR5ing them via forum RP is fine, I just looked at the right:

Example: The LPI could request that a smuggler be made hostile to them but only after conducting some sort of role play around this situation. A role play trial conducted on the forum with the evidence would be a good way to do this.

---

User was banned for: Griefing others
Time left: (Permanent)

[SnakThree]

Read again. It clearly states evidence is needed then. TLAGSNET scan is not evidence.

---