Reaver Mercenary Co.

[Diomedes]

Now, in regards to the post below it. I'm blown away by that. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm getting that you're upset there because we're too active and too good at what we do.

That was not at all the intent. That I see you guys so often and you are so active reflects well on your faction. I have nothing against that nor am I upset by it. In the end it really doesn't matter if it's a Reaver or a KNF that shoots me dead does it?

The statement was made to be an explanation of why employers hire the Reavers back after periods of having them as enemies. The situation may not be horribly realistic, but it's Disco and a game and there's lots of things to pick apart. May as well just enjoy it. If anyone needs to correct their dealings in regards to all this, it is indeed the major, supposedly powerful employers who need to make the RP decision.

@Wuselkobold:
Medieval mercs had the ability to have as good as equipment as their enemies and fight them man to man. There is a large difference when professional armies have access to much more powerful technology than mercs do in futuristic/modern armies (i.e. cruisers and battleships). In my mind, this means the modern mercenary is playing more of an augmentation, then front-line role.


As a final comment of the Reavers themselves: you conduct yourselves well in game and very importantly respond well to feedback which is awesome. Keep up the good work, but get that tangle of rules around the Gallic tech sorted out because I'm now as confused as you guys. I though Zelot's statement was all Gallic tech, not just Gallic civillian.

---