This pretty much sums up my attitude to the comments at the moment until something constructive pops up
What has been said has been constructive, just because you don't like it doesn't mean it wasn't constructive. I'm curious as to why Murphy didn't post this and why he isn't here taking feed back? Possibly because he knows his past was going to be brought up and he knows what he did was wrong and is staying silent at the behest of other members of the faction?
I've nothing against Murphy, but seeing as this is a Bretonian faction that has to work with the BAF & other Bretonian factions the leadership has to be able to get along with the leadership of the factions it interacts with. Murphy's history here very clearly shows he has no intention to try to get along with any other player faction and only wants to do what he wants to do, how he wants to do it.
That attitude will be the downfall of this faction. As it already killed the IAB once. History, learn from it.
Would it hurt Murphy to merely be a member of IAB's HC? Let another actually take the leader position? I mean, in most of my factions the leader title is just that. A title. He doesn't own the faction, the members do.
Basically, for the betterment of the faction, why can't Murphy step down and let someone else where the tiara? Or is it more about Murphy and less about the faction itself?