Do Bombers suck as much as I think they do?

[chopper]

Ok, i'v checked the numbers and..
Every bomber should be above 1.0 max angular speed.
Maybe only RM should stay (if it wasn't nerfed, and users don't complain).

The logical explanation for this is simple.
Falcata is above 1, and everyone says it's fine and balanced.
Dragon is above 1, everyone says it's fine.
Kusari is above 1, everyone says it's fine.
Taiidan is bellow 1.0, and i'm bitching hard about it.
Barghest is 0.83, can't imagine that one.
Don't forget the Civilian, Praetorian, Brettonian (not sure about this one, just guessing),
It should be something like.
If for example (i'm just taking this, as two most opposite sides) Outcasts are great Capital ship builders, Corsairs should have better bombers.
And now, Outcasts have better capital ships, and better bombers. Great:)

Can't we bring them closer one to another?
All should be pretty much the same, around 1.0, and only Kusari and Dragon slightly more agile.

(this is just a suggestion, not flaming the mod, not flaming the agile-bomber users)

---

It is every Corsair's responsibility to die a beautiful death in defense of Crete, regardless of how OORP or how capwhoring the opposition is. Launch your fighter, joust the battlecruisers and die a beautiful death. Then, drink it down in the bar.

Can't let you bash folks in your sig Chopper-Del