Orbital Spa and Cruise Information

[Skullz]

Let me explain how I came to come to the conclusion of making the post that I did.

I saw Alvins post. I thought about it. My first instinct was that it was sarcastic. I then left it for a day. 24 hours later I go in to the thread, press reply, when it loads the reply screen I see Dab has made a post in the same tone and character.

That is to say that (In my view) both were sarcastic and Dabs was talking down to me as if Kim was a 6 year old, and that both were taking it the wrong way of how my post was written in it's intent. Because of the roleplay I saw, which was of rudeness, talking down and completely thinking that the intent of the post is something different, and taking in account that they have not understood the meaning of 'review' I then made a post equal to their actions that they made.

In a nut shell: (All roleplay wise)
1- I post, say a view in hopes of being given any further information that can help, and show my intent is to only review it so that I and others understand its meaning. (the Treaty)
2- I get one person in response talking down me.
3- I get another doing the same.
4- I see that both are being sarcasticly rude in their own manner.
5- I see that they are un-responsive to understanding its intent.
6- That they are not willing to speak towards Kim in a good manner.
7- That they are not willing to understand the meanings that are made clear to them.
8- I think of how I can approach them.
9- I decide that because they have not read it properly, understand it properly, see the intent as it is shown to them, and that they are rude, talking down to me as if they are better than me and being sarcastic in their tones, that I will reply to them pointing out they they have not taken it the correct away and untill they do that they should not act like children, nor should make something out of it that does not exist.
10- made my post as you all can see as I have pasted it in to a post in this thread.

If you feel that I went the wrong way about it, why don't you please show me how I should have, or how I should have taken their posts? No one has done this with myself, only complained that they think it was wrong. All I have tried to do so far is explain it over and over again, yet I still feel that those involved and have complained still are not happy with it. This is the, er, forgotton how many times now, that I have tried to explain the logic behind it. Untill those that think it was wrong in what I did explain how it was wrong and provide full explainations, as I continue to give, and provide how they think it should have been handled.

Untill then stop saying that you think it is wrong.

Furthermore, Arthur by going by what you know is not arrogance. If someone wishes to explain how they think I should have done, I will be open to them, and if I see it being of use I will use that technique. You are assuming that I am not open to learning a new techniques where as I am. That does not constitute arrogance. Maybe you need to look the word up.

The act or habit of arrogating, or making undue claims in an overbearing manner; that species of pride which consists in exorbitant claims of rank, dignity, estimation, or power, or which exalts the worth or importance of the person to an undue degree; proud contempt of others; lordliness; haughtiness; self-assumption; presumption. Closely related to the act of arrogating.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/arrogance

---