Posts: 6,909
Threads: 415
Joined: Aug 2007
Staff roles: Story Dev Economy Dev
' Wrote:
Bretonian operations inside of the NATO zone have worked in co-ordination with the Liberty Navy to secure the space in question on several occasions. In fact this region is exceptionally stable due to this treaty.
I am, as well as others in the Bretonian Government, in favour of renewing the treaty. However, the important principles of it must remain consistent.
I am sure my counterpart in the Liberty Navy will agree.
And because something is old, doesn't mean that it is obsolete. There is a reason that section of space is safe, stable, and quiet.
' Wrote:
I believe you missed Article 1, Clause 3 of this treaty, Ms. Allen, that states all decisions regarding the future of the governance of these systems be decided by the quartet of this treaty through amendments to this treaty. If you wish to abolish this treaty, you are going to need two other supporters to agree to do so as well. Bretonia certainly has no interest in abolishing this treaty, which serves its purpose well.
I read them through again, just to check, and I honestly can't see any sarcastic or abrasive comments. They're both informative and formally written. Just because they're not agreeing with you, doesn't mean they're being sarcastic. They seem perfectly civilised to me, RPing as politicians and bureaucrats. By all means, go ahead and highlight the sarcastic bits. Now, contrast with this:
Quote:So stop acting like whining babies about something that was not said. Or are you blind!?
Now stop making up stupid things and calm the hell down you blind and complete utter idiots. As obviously you can't read this, "This is a notification that we are reviewing the treaty only." I seriously have no clue what drugs you two are taking, but it is very clear you are high.
Are you seeing the problem here? 1) That was a massive overreaction, and 2) your claims that they were acting childish appear to be slightly hypocritical.
Thinking of hypocritical, I've also seen the chatlogs where you've admitted Dab has never insulted or coerced you, shortly after you've called him some absolutely vile things. You're not going to convince me it's Dab who has the issue here.
So, how to improve? Certainly. Write back in civil, formal tones. Don't get flustered or angry. Be informative. Don't snap. Like I said, it's not a pissing contest to see who can be the snarkiest.
EDIT: Whoa, whoa. Arthur, if defending yourself is a sign of guilt admission, how do you protect your reputation when you haven't actually done anything wrong? :lol: