Defending on self is not a sign of guilt. Only an idiot would say such a thing. Also I do not hold myself higher then them. I recognise our differences in age and life experience. But if you believe that it is arrogance that it is fact that I am older and wiser through my age and life experiences then you are only being agist.
There is a very common saying, 'The older you are, the wiser you become.' which will be only to to me and others as we gain age. That is a proven fact. If referencing a fact, when my intent is to show that I recognise something, is arrogance as you so put it, then I am arrogant as you so put it, but then you are being arrogant in the respect that you disagree with a fact that is proven, and also when the intent of the reference is to show that the person or persons respect that difference. Arrogance is an action, I am not being arrogant in the fashion of that I feel that their roleplay is worse than mine in their skill level. They are the one argueing that mine is wrong and stupid, based upon their own false interpretations of what I have written. I have made that clear to them explaining it. They don't want to listen to me (arrogance) and are not wishing to explain how they see it themselves.
So in reallity the most arrogant persons here are those that do not wish to understand what I have explained to them, and nor willing to explain their ideals of what should have happened.
Now either please stop wasting my time with yourself.
Edit: namely for the post Jammi just posted just before myself.
Quote:Thinking of hypocritical, I've also seen the chatlogs where you've admitted Dab has never insulted or coerced you, shortly after you've called him some absolutely vile things. You're not going to convince me it's Dab who has the issue here.
He has acted in a vile manner, I have not especially in relation to this. What I did own up to was of myself misintrepertating certain things about an issue that has already passed. Get your facts right.
Quote:So, how to improve? Certainly. Write back in civil, formal tones. Don't get flustered or angry. Be informative. Don't snap. Like I said, it's not a pissing contest to see who can be the snarkiest.
I did not recieve a post that was in a civil manner. A Civil manner includes and up to the following. Being of talking in relation to what is said, and it's intentions. I made those very clear. Saying that it is something is is considered rude in manners.
They were also talking thus because they though it was something that it is not and argue it oorp and inrp with me still, is talking down to me and also rude. It is also written in a sarcastic fashion. I see it. Deadric does to, and The IMG roleplay in the thread also shows this.
Also repling in a fashion of making it something that it is not is also not the fashion that a politician would take.
Obviously your view of manners does not extend to mine. Why should I treat someone whom gets something wrong and sarcastic in the fashion that they think your intention is to do a certain something, when in fact it is not. No as you still do not want to see my point of view please get out of this thread. This discussion is closed.