You did not ask where. You assumed where.
You really want to know. ok.
First , metagaming I thought you metagamed in IC's action not to attend. You can say that it was Kim's attitude, but the attitude that she herself recieved from you was of hostility.
Second, I put down what you have been trying to argue to me, in what you have assumed I meant as metagaming as roleplay I do not understand. I had two characters come to me, both from IC as far as I know and both acted as so. I recognise that one is only repersenting the company, and the other I recognise as only repersenting Waterloo Station in a government capacity of Bretonia. I mention that. In return the roleplay I recieve is of being accused of making up false information. And then you do not like my characters attitude when she replied of saying of, "That only one Interspace employee is coming to the Summit." You response, if I go by why you claim as your reason not to attend the Summit. The facts were, two Interspace employees, one repersenting the company, the other as an MP of Bretonia and interests to Waterloo Station. I tell others as an example. I get told I am making things up, and that only one IC employee is attending. Then in this thread you claim that the latter repersentative is not an employee. No proof was shown in roleplay. The character was roleplayed to what I saw that he was an IC employee. And yet you can't accept it.
Honestly, I do not know what your aim is, other than blame me for anything.
@Dab
You are one of the few that I would lliked to respond to. Your post was very good and informative. I will just simply say now that it is apperant I did not research properly. To the extent that I should have. However I do know what a Duke is. And I also disagree with how your view of how a Parliment works. Lastly it seems to me that you like to make up a party that has never existed, and make a parliment and royalism cooperation that has never been seen in the history of England. But that is my own view based on myself watching the britsih government, and having seen how it works from the inside, as well as historical common knowledge to myself and many other british persons. I decided not to bother to make replies because there were many people whom wish to continue on a one track mind and not accept that I have accepted certain things that I have already owned up to that was wrong, and continue to want to ignore what I have said to them. (A case of the few ruining it for the many. It was not intentional ignorance. I did note down my reasons as to why. But I see that is has been ignored, or not understood by yourself. Prehaps that is my own fault.)