' Wrote:Battlecruiser are supposed to have the same agility as Battleships. They should be faster only.
Their task normally is to outgun smaller cruisers and destroyer. So the only thing they could need is a thruster.
Thats for the tactical aspect.
Now to the skills. Always i see posted agility stats. These stats have a lesser difference than the skills of the pilots.
Also it seems some of you just want to compensate, that you cannot fly as many battleships as you want, because of the license. And now you want the BC as a "loophole" Battleship.
For those people my disrespect
AoM
yes..i agree with you....battleship already cost so many money and need a license to fly it...
from wikipedia
battlecruisers were similar in layout and armament to battleships but they traded off armour or firepower for higher speed, which showed in their more powerful engines and slender hulls; they still retained enough firepower and protection to be classified as capital ships.
now..there is a problem..Battlecruiser's energy recharge rate is way more faster than Battleship..so their firepower is even higher than battleship..(heavy weapons.like cerberus..when i take down the hugo battleship i feel battlecruiser is insane....and with that energy recharge rate..so they can fire so many times).....for battleship..once their energy gone..is gone..(recharge rate not fast enough..)..for battlecruiser..it recharge so fast....so..should we make battlecruiser's recharge %/s should equal to battleship?
