• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 227 228 229 230 231 … 547 Next »
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take.

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take.
Offline Aphil
01-02-2012, 12:21 AM,
#22
Member
Posts: 1,531
Threads: 100
Joined: Jan 2010

It's not so much the Battleships but the Bombers that would the biggest problems. They'll have to E-K to keep up with the Battleship. It'll be beyond difficult in open space to and downright impossible in an asteroid field. Not to mention Cruise Drain. Overall, I have to admit this is a poorly thought out idea. >.>

| Sirius Coalition | Information Centre  | Recruitment Centre | Visa Application | Communication Centre |
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Pinko - 12-29-2011, 03:28 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Maelstrom - 12-29-2011, 03:43 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Rommie - 12-29-2011, 04:00 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Zynth - 12-29-2011, 04:05 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Camtheman - 12-29-2011, 07:59 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Aphil - 12-29-2011, 08:03 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Rodent - 12-29-2011, 08:14 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Jinx - 12-29-2011, 08:16 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Camtheman - 12-29-2011, 08:36 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by AshHill07 - 12-29-2011, 09:12 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by pitockm - 12-29-2011, 09:45 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Maelstrom - 12-30-2011, 01:07 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Lunaphase - 12-30-2011, 02:37 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Maelstrom - 12-30-2011, 03:18 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by CandidFriend - 12-30-2011, 03:42 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by abysswolf - 12-30-2011, 04:12 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Petitioner - 12-30-2011, 05:35 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by CandidFriend - 12-31-2011, 07:06 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Zynth - 12-31-2011, 04:46 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Aphil - 01-01-2012, 12:43 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Rodent - 01-01-2012, 10:19 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Aphil - 01-02-2012, 12:21 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Maelstrom - 01-02-2012, 12:38 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode