GRN feedback thread

[Dab]

Equipment/Commodities.

Not certain but I suspect that it was meant as both in the case of 3.1/3.1.1

But I'm no Gallic pro so meh...

I don't think that argument works when you're directing it towards one of the two people who wrote the laws. We know what we meant, and if we meant commodities, we would've written commodities. It's clearly marked as equipment, in the Ships and Equipment section, which was intentionally kept fully separate from the commodity section of the laws. If 3.1 and 3.1.1 covered equipment and commodities, we'd have just added it to the end of the commodity section, and not given it its own.

I'm perfectly fine with working with Junker players that want to roleplay Gallic ones. We need more of them. I gave Skullz a chance when he started roleplaying this GSC group. However, since he started, he has broken the law repeatedly. He is the only Junker claiming to be Gallic that is having these problems with GRN and the crown. Obvious, given that he is the only one having these problems, there is something wrong that he is doing that the others are not.

Now, I gave the option of arrest or exile of that character. He can roleplay that character going into exile, hell, even commanding GSC from exile, secretly, while another character acts as the "legal face" of the GSC, and GSC's right to trade in Gallia (after it registers) will be re-permitted. It's his choice, and he can make GSC work. But we aren't going to contradict our own lore just to make his work.

---