• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 227 228 229 230 231 … 547 Next »
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take.

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take.
Offline Pinko
12-29-2011, 03:28 PM,
#1
Mr Onion
Posts: 3,189
Threads: 388
Joined: Jun 2009

So, I was just discussing with some people the possibility of using thrusters on Battleships, and a single method came out of it, which would entirely change the dynamic of battleships:

Battleships would have no speed at all, and would have no possibilities to use Cruise engines. They'd have to rely only and entirely on their thrusters to move, slowly gaining momentum from 0 to 300. Only in a single complete thruster charge you could reach your maximum speed, and letting go of the thruster button would slowly reduce the speed of the ship (as if it were EKing), and reversing would reduce the speed even moreso, and would also let you back up.

As a result, Battleships would have less mobility than most ships, while giving them the potential to have more firepower as a result, while still keeping considerable speed. They would still have to gauge their speed continuously while fighting to keep up decently with other ships and not outspeed them, since they would still be able to fire even if they head at a speed of 300 m/s. This would, also, make them undisruptable. Bombers would also likely have to cruise up to catch up with them and do some sort of weird EK dance around it to try to keep up if it decides to flee, so I don't know how this part would be balanced.

Thoughts?

I want to get off Mr. Igiss' wild ride.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Pinko - 12-29-2011, 03:28 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Maelstrom - 12-29-2011, 03:43 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Rommie - 12-29-2011, 04:00 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Zynth - 12-29-2011, 04:05 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Camtheman - 12-29-2011, 07:59 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Aphil - 12-29-2011, 08:03 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Rodent - 12-29-2011, 08:14 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Jinx - 12-29-2011, 08:16 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Camtheman - 12-29-2011, 08:36 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by AshHill07 - 12-29-2011, 09:12 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by pitockm - 12-29-2011, 09:45 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Maelstrom - 12-30-2011, 01:07 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Lunaphase - 12-30-2011, 02:37 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Maelstrom - 12-30-2011, 03:18 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by CandidFriend - 12-30-2011, 03:42 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by abysswolf - 12-30-2011, 04:12 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Petitioner - 12-30-2011, 05:35 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by CandidFriend - 12-31-2011, 07:06 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Zynth - 12-31-2011, 04:46 PM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Aphil - 01-01-2012, 12:43 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Rodent - 01-01-2012, 10:19 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Aphil - 01-02-2012, 12:21 AM
Hypothesis: Battleship thrusters: an alternative take. - by Maelstrom - 01-02-2012, 12:38 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode