' Wrote:Ah, you meant in regards to that, I thought you were referring to that post I made after that one. Yes, I was being sarcastic and I was using Luxury Goods as an example that was similar to your example of Tea. It would indeed make no sense for a socialist organization to demand either Luxury Goods, Tea, or whatever other household commodity a house would need, and I'm glad you agree.
I've made my points as to why we should be able to demand Artifacts and any further argument would just involve saying the same points but in a different way. So I end this here.
What? Uggggggg. See I thought you were flirting with me, I dont anymore.
Guess I do have to explain it.
Well, the luxury goods are the food of the bourgeoisie. The idea of which is the opiate of the proletariat. It represents the opposite of everything the People's revolution stands for. Luxury goods motivate the worker to reach for riches for themselves, forgoing the good of the people for their own selfish ends.
You see, it actually makes more sense for the SCRA to target Luxury Goods than it does for the SCRA to target artifacts.