Oh my.
I simply stated out that 2 IDs lost their civilian protective clauses with no reason( SCRA ID and HF ID)
and one ID (RoS ID) got a way too vague explanation what they can attack and what they cannot- according to me adding protective civilian clause will fix this it. SCRA ID had also not defined what is contraband and what it could demand and what it cannot.
Without those clauses this 3 IDs are clearly Terrorist IDs, 2 of them with some ZoI and one without any ZoI, i still don't get the point of trolling around and accusing me for pointing out the obvious.
Stop blaming me for giving input that was requested to give:
' Wrote:This post contains the 120 IDs for the next update of the mod. Please read and comment if you find errors or there are significant issues for the content of individual IDs.
Stop trolling each other and bring corpses from your closets that are more then several years old. Stop being hypocrite to each other, I am sure that nobody here wants 4.85 8 nomad gunned scopions back except for the people that have flown it. I am also sure that this factions with the said IDs would request putting back the protective clauses if they have no intention to hurt civilians, anything other will be pure hypocrisy and will show the clear intentions of the said ID users- "PvP all that I can see"
TL:TR version:
If the admins are np with giving this 3 closed factions Terrorist IDs with other names, we players don't have any influence over it, if not then you can put the civilian protective clauses back. That is all simple worded. Since Zelot is admin and he got my feedback this topic served its purpose.
(10-09-2013, 10:51 AM)Knjaz Wrote: Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)
