Discovery Freelancer 4.86 Update 5 Released

[CommanderX]

So many changes and yet navy upholder was ignored.

Compasion!
Upholder | bergelmir
Guns/Turrets 4 / 2 | 4 / 2
Opt. weapon class 6 | 6
Max. weapon class 6 | 6
Additional equipment 2xCD/T | 2xCD/T
1xCM | 1xCM
1xM | 1xM
Hull strength 17,600 | 19,400
Max. shield class 10 | 10
Cargo space 80 units | 105
Nanobots/Batteries 85/85 | 100/100
Max. impulse speed 80 m/s | 80 m/s
Max. thrust speed 199 m/s | 199 m/s
Max. cruise speed unknown | unknown
Power output 38,200 u | 45,390 u
Power recharge 1,722 u/s | 1,880 u/s
Ship price $7,750,000 | $6,480,000

Rheinalnd bomber is cheaper, stronger, more agile.
I m not here to complain about liberty tech to be weaker than rheinalnd, but it is very very long when rheinalnd have 2 bombers, and bergelmir is realy realy hard to hit when liberty have 1 weak bomber when liberty need a good bomber desperatly again much stronger RNC caps.

Also I need to mention that LABC was trash in 4:85 and is still not a good ship now in 4:86.
Practicly because it is turret ark is not to good ( from 6 light slots only 4 shots around, and the rest turrets ark is bad in close combat ).
LABC is alot slower than Kuzary BC what have 140 speed and superiour agility, when LABC is full of weakpoints and not have best turret arks.

I saw how Dragon light cruizer in conecticut defeated [LN]-LABC what had pulses/cerberus/primarys on without even lossing a shield.
And if RNC cruizer with so many turrets manage to get behind LABC, LABC is doomed.

So yea, LABC is still not a good ship and Upholder was and is still far worse than rheinland bombers.

Just pointing out somethink that has been ignored.

---