New York PVP?

[Spear]

I'm not against people flying the small ships Xoria, A few days ago in my Patriot I stopped a high level trader carrying Counterfeit software. I could not even graze his sheilds and he nearly had me a couple of times. I continued to CD him and called for help on system comm and thankfully an independant LSF arrived in a VHF and we struck him down :D

I think it was Jinx that engaged one of my Xeno Eagles the other day in her lvl 30 Patriot, I offered the brave LPI a chance to retreat that she refused to take and I was forced to blow her to smithereens!

Lower class ships can be RP'd beutifully and are only cannon fodder if you choose them to be, the same is true of any ship. It's exactly the same thing as being over level 30 and being engaged by a vastly superior ship. It's true people could swap to a civillian ID and blast lawful NPC's under the proposed new rule. But then I dont see how your suggestion stops these under level Xeno's from doing the same as before. I can ignore an under level 30 Civillan ID player as they are immune to RP and PVP attack. It annoys me that a Xeno ID player does this though in full view of us all.

Has anyone else noticed that we now have a neutral ID again? We're just calling it the Civilian ID now, and it expires at rank 40. Guess what nearly every storage ship and armory will soon be ID'd as; and back in NY with impunity.

With the greatest respect you realise this is wrong don't you? Civillian ID's above level 30 are not immune to RP or attack and any storage above level 40 Cannot use a civillian ID.

Something needs to be done about under level civillians being accosted. The whole point of this thread is exactly the opposite of what you wrote in that quote. The under level 30 civillian ID has not been neutral. Under level 30 civillians are being murdered with a passion in all systems and it has to stop now! You said it yourself, you were killed in a level 5 starbug by not one but two players, that's disgraceful.

Maybe it's getting late but I just do not see your suggestion as being simpler or better than what Igiss already posted.

---

=LSF=