• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 686 687 688 689 690 … 779 Next »
Was this right or wrong?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Was this right or wrong?
Offline Juan_Arquero
01-30-2008, 04:23 AM,
#8
Member
Posts: 551
Threads: 18
Joined: Sep 2007

IMG should be neutral to both BHG and Red Hessians. If anybody doesn't believe me, go to IMG's Friestadt Base in Omega-7. Dock there. If you are neutral with the BHG (no more than one pink box), you should see missions available from the BHG in the bar. If you're hostile, you should still see some BHG representatives in the bar, but they won't want to talk to you. The fact that IMG bases offer missions on behalf of BHG and that BHG representatives can be found in IMG base bars proves that IMG is neutral to BHG. While you're on Friestadt Base, use F9 to read the base description that says Red Hessians sometimes dock there to sell ore. After you launch from Friestadt Base, stay nearby and you should see a single Red Hessian docking a few times per hour (I've seen this in vanilla, so it should be true in Discovery, too).

' Wrote:"IMG ID owner cannot participate in any unlawful actions or military operations."

I read this as: IMG owner cannot participate in any unlawful action or unlawful military operation. That means to say military operations are ok as long as they are lawful.

But, now that I look at it closer, it could be read either Dabs way or mine. Another imprecision that must be ironed out I guess.
Yngen and Dab: The prohibition on unlawful actions would apply to all unlawful actions, including unlawful military operations. Since military operations are also specifically prohibited that means that both lawful and unlawful military operations are prohibited. The answer is clear to me.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Was this right or wrong? - by RodgerDodgy - 01-30-2008, 12:16 AM
Was this right or wrong? - by tfmachad - 01-30-2008, 01:18 AM
Was this right or wrong? - by uspatriotsf - 01-30-2008, 01:42 AM
Was this right or wrong? - by Dab - 01-30-2008, 02:12 AM
Was this right or wrong? - by Yngen - 01-30-2008, 02:19 AM
Was this right or wrong? - by Dab - 01-30-2008, 02:23 AM
Was this right or wrong? - by chopper - 01-30-2008, 03:50 AM
Was this right or wrong? - by Juan_Arquero - 01-30-2008, 04:23 AM
Was this right or wrong? - by chopper - 01-30-2008, 04:31 AM
Was this right or wrong? - by Doom - 01-30-2008, 08:39 AM
Was this right or wrong? - by RodgerDodgy - 01-30-2008, 10:09 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode