The SCRA

[DarthBindo]

The inconsistency. That's what I consider wrong.

So you're hopping on the admins are right because admins boat I guess. Rofl.

Hardly that, nor is it stated nor inferred anywhere in my post. I simply wish to have a similar set of roleplay standards and rules for everyone.

You could just as easily swap it around and protest for people having larger ZoIs, leading to more activity and more stuff going on, which is something Discovery sorely needs.

If you wish to enlarge my ZoI, then by all means. I shan't protest at all. Should my commonly played factions be granted a ZoI even somewhat approaching that of the SCRA I shall gladly retire my protests. But that is the opposite of the direction the server has been moving in since the Outcast death squads of Bretonia and the usage of Alaska as a transport route and the PHOOMS EVERYWHERE.

As for small-unit tactics, is that the only deciding difference? If a corsair or molly group (for argument's sake) were to decide to only use small-unit tactics, would it too go unmolested by adminy powers wherever it roamed?
Traditionally, complete freedom goes along with very little power, yet in the SCRA we see both to a very, very large extent.

The territory that the SCRA actually holds is what I consider to be a far bigger deciding factor. A single system is far more defensible than several, particularly when it has a mere two chokepoints and is far away from house space. (The closest house is NAP'd and kind of being sieged by the French for that matter)

This may very well be another argument i'm bringing in here, but the closest house is very much un-NAP'ed, and happens to have a major base within 30 klicks of the Omega-52 hole alongside more battleships that you could shake a stick at, although the defensibility of a chokepointed system is certainly a good point considering that.

---

gone four years, first day back: Zoners still getting shot in Theta :|