GB balancing for 4.87

Hi there Guest,

Existing user? Create account

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Reduce firepower or agility? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Firepower	44.68%	21	44.68%
Agility	55.32%	26	55.32%
Total		47 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

GB balancing for 4.87

Offline

12-15-2012, 03:47 PM,

#24

Former Admin

Posts: 3,080
Threads: 73
Joined: May 2012

The required nerf is a consequence of their now increased (use of) agility with TS, and increased accuracy with TZ. Since these are unlikely to be removed (although I agree limiting zoom would be some help), another solution is required.

The decrease in DPS for regular GB Turrets was chosen, as this moves the focus onto other GB turrets. If you want to fight other GBs, you use Cerbs. If you think you've got the skills, Pulse/Razor boats have more importance. If you don't think you're good with either of them, you can still do fairly well with regular turrets.
Right now, all situations are trumped by regular turrets.

Kingdom of Bretonia
Colonial Republic
Independent Miners Guild
Ex-Admin

Reply

Messages In This Thread

GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-15-2012, 05:17 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Stealthsultn - 12-15-2012, 05:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ichiru - 12-15-2012, 05:45 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ascalon - 12-15-2012, 05:56 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 06:01 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-15-2012, 10:30 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by bloogaL - 12-15-2012, 10:38 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:02 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by aerelm - 12-18-2012, 12:27 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by jonfreelanc - 12-15-2012, 06:38 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JayDee Kasane - 12-15-2012, 06:47 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-15-2012, 07:23 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-15-2012, 07:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 11:10 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-15-2012, 11:18 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:21 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Giorgio - 12-15-2012, 11:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 11:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jack_Henderson - 12-15-2012, 11:45 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:57 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 12:07 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Vrabcek - 12-15-2012, 01:42 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jansen - 12-15-2012, 03:17 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by TonyRistar - 12-15-2012, 03:44 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-15-2012, 05:04 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Knjaz - 12-15-2012, 06:16 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 12-15-2012, 03:47 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Pavel - 12-15-2012, 04:14 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Vrabcek - 12-15-2012, 04:26 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Charos - 12-15-2012, 04:17 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Pavel - 12-15-2012, 06:33 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Sava - 12-15-2012, 07:25 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Blodo - 12-15-2012, 07:37 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jansen - 12-17-2012, 09:43 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-17-2012, 10:30 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Redon - 12-15-2012, 09:47 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Govedo13 - 12-16-2012, 02:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by TonyRistar - 12-16-2012, 05:14 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-16-2012, 06:17 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 12-16-2012, 06:32 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-17-2012, 06:35 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-17-2012, 10:35 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JIVA - 12-17-2012, 10:41 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-17-2012, 10:52 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JIVA - 12-17-2012, 10:56 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-18-2012, 01:43 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 12:03 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Stealthsultn - 12-18-2012, 12:10 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Omicron - 12-18-2012, 12:56 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-18-2012, 02:25 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-18-2012, 04:43 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Knjaz - 12-18-2012, 11:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by monmarfori - 01-02-2013, 05:13 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 01-02-2013, 06:14 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Tabris - 01-02-2013, 06:26 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jack_Henderson - 01-02-2013, 09:56 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Zynth - 01-02-2013, 10:33 AM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)