GB balancing for 4.87

Hi there Guest,

Existing user? Create account

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Reduce firepower or agility? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Firepower	44.68%	21	44.68%
Agility	55.32%	26	55.32%
Total		47 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

GB balancing for 4.87

Offline

12-15-2012, 09:47 PM,

#33

Member

Posts: 466
Threads: 24
Joined: Apr 2012

In my opinion, gunboats are supposed to be the snubkillers they are now. Perhaps Pulse/Razor setups could use a buff instead, since they're barely used now. Nerfing stuff whenever a problem occurs can't be the best solution.

(12-15-2012, 06:47 AM)JayDee Wrote: again - to make GBs not OP - light BGs must have weaker shield. GBs supposed to kill bombers, so its not possible to Nova it and hardly possible to SNAC it.

Agreed with the thought on shields - the size difference between certain gunboats is quite extreme, and the fact that those that need to rely on dodging have precisely the same shield power as those that rely on tanking is silly.

(12-15-2012, 05:45 AM)ichiru Wrote: The ones in the SP storyline could be killed by single fighters.

Troll? In SP, I also killed an entire fleet of the Rheinland military with my light fighter.

(12-15-2012, 05:22 AM)caelinsheahan Wrote: I vote agility, however some Gunboats could use some help------>Turret steering KILLED the poor Bottlenose and it could use some help. Its more a case by case basis.

...Yeah, the bottlenose definitely needs to be buffed.

Have you ever even fought one?

[Image: sGc8r.jpg]

[Image: sGc8r.jpg]

Reply

Messages In This Thread

GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-15-2012, 05:17 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Stealthsultn - 12-15-2012, 05:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ichiru - 12-15-2012, 05:45 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ascalon - 12-15-2012, 05:56 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 06:01 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-15-2012, 10:30 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by bloogaL - 12-15-2012, 10:38 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:02 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by aerelm - 12-18-2012, 12:27 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by jonfreelanc - 12-15-2012, 06:38 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JayDee Kasane - 12-15-2012, 06:47 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-15-2012, 07:23 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-15-2012, 07:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 11:10 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-15-2012, 11:18 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:21 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Giorgio - 12-15-2012, 11:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 11:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jack_Henderson - 12-15-2012, 11:45 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:57 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 12:07 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Vrabcek - 12-15-2012, 01:42 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jansen - 12-15-2012, 03:17 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by TonyRistar - 12-15-2012, 03:44 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-15-2012, 05:04 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Knjaz - 12-15-2012, 06:16 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 12-15-2012, 03:47 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Pavel - 12-15-2012, 04:14 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Vrabcek - 12-15-2012, 04:26 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Charos - 12-15-2012, 04:17 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Pavel - 12-15-2012, 06:33 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Sava - 12-15-2012, 07:25 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Blodo - 12-15-2012, 07:37 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jansen - 12-17-2012, 09:43 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-17-2012, 10:30 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Redon - 12-15-2012, 09:47 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Govedo13 - 12-16-2012, 02:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by TonyRistar - 12-16-2012, 05:14 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-16-2012, 06:17 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 12-16-2012, 06:32 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-17-2012, 06:35 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-17-2012, 10:35 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JIVA - 12-17-2012, 10:41 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-17-2012, 10:52 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JIVA - 12-17-2012, 10:56 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-18-2012, 01:43 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 12:03 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Stealthsultn - 12-18-2012, 12:10 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Omicron - 12-18-2012, 12:56 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-18-2012, 02:25 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-18-2012, 04:43 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Knjaz - 12-18-2012, 11:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by monmarfori - 01-02-2013, 05:13 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 01-02-2013, 06:14 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Tabris - 01-02-2013, 06:26 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jack_Henderson - 01-02-2013, 09:56 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Zynth - 01-02-2013, 10:33 AM

Users browsing this thread:

2 Guest(s)