• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 165 166 167 168 169 … 547 Next »
GB balancing for 4.87

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Reduce firepower or agility?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Firepower
44.68%
21 44.68%
Agility
55.32%
26 55.32%
Total 47 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

GB balancing for 4.87
Offline Govedo13
12-16-2012, 02:29 AM,
#34
Member
Posts: 4,663
Threads: 97
Joined: Jul 2009

(12-15-2012, 07:37 PM)Blodo Wrote: force gunboats to mount other loadouts than full primary which is the main reason for the nerf.
If there is anything I missed, point it out and I'll respond.
I think that all primary gb guns should be removed, together with some small changes on solaris and cerbs and P/Rs. The main problem with the gbs is not that they kill snubs well, they are supposed to do so, the problem is that they also kill everything well because the great versatility of the primary guns- they work well vs snubs, vs other gbs and vs caps. So one GB is really more useful then any other ship class in any group action.
If there were no primaries the GB pilots must choose against what they want to be effective- if they want to go anti-snub they use the Solaris guns( a bit weak DPS then now and a bit more speed) that have good accuracy and do no essential dmg vs other things.
Same story if they go full cerbs( energy effective,high DPS, 500-600 speed)- they rape transps other gbs and are also useful support vs caps but fail vs snubs.
P/R need less refire rate and more speed, so this loadouts would be more effective vs snubs and less effective vs caps.
I see no reason why primaries should exist really, also it balances the factions with better turrets together with the factions with not so good turrets.

€œ
(10-09-2013, 10:51 AM)Knjaz Wrote: Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)

Reply  


Messages In This Thread
GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-15-2012, 05:17 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Stealthsultn - 12-15-2012, 05:22 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ichiru - 12-15-2012, 05:45 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ascalon - 12-15-2012, 05:56 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 06:01 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-15-2012, 10:30 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by bloogaL - 12-15-2012, 10:38 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:02 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by aerelm - 12-18-2012, 12:27 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by jonfreelanc - 12-15-2012, 06:38 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JayDee Kasane - 12-15-2012, 06:47 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-15-2012, 07:23 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-15-2012, 07:29 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 11:10 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-15-2012, 11:18 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:21 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Giorgio - 12-15-2012, 11:22 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 11:22 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jack_Henderson - 12-15-2012, 11:45 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:57 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 12:07 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Vrabcek - 12-15-2012, 01:42 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jansen - 12-15-2012, 03:17 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by TonyRistar - 12-15-2012, 03:44 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-15-2012, 05:04 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Knjaz - 12-15-2012, 06:16 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 12-15-2012, 03:47 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Pavel - 12-15-2012, 04:14 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Vrabcek - 12-15-2012, 04:26 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Charos - 12-15-2012, 04:17 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Pavel - 12-15-2012, 06:33 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Sava - 12-15-2012, 07:25 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Blodo - 12-15-2012, 07:37 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jansen - 12-17-2012, 09:43 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-17-2012, 10:30 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Redon - 12-15-2012, 09:47 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Govedo13 - 12-16-2012, 02:29 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by TonyRistar - 12-16-2012, 05:14 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-16-2012, 06:17 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 12-16-2012, 06:32 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-17-2012, 06:35 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-17-2012, 10:35 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JIVA - 12-17-2012, 10:41 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-17-2012, 10:52 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JIVA - 12-17-2012, 10:56 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-18-2012, 01:43 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 12:03 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Stealthsultn - 12-18-2012, 12:10 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Omicron - 12-18-2012, 12:56 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:22 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-18-2012, 02:25 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:29 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-18-2012, 04:43 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Knjaz - 12-18-2012, 11:29 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by monmarfori - 01-02-2013, 05:13 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 01-02-2013, 06:14 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Tabris - 01-02-2013, 06:26 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jack_Henderson - 01-02-2013, 09:56 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Zynth - 01-02-2013, 10:33 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode