GB balancing for 4.87

Hi there Guest,

Existing user? Create account

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Reduce firepower or agility? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Firepower	44.68%	21	44.68%
Agility	55.32%	26	55.32%
Total		47 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

GB balancing for 4.87

Offline

12-16-2012, 06:32 PM,

#37

Former Admin

Posts: 3,080
Threads: 73
Joined: May 2012

Well as Blodo has said (being the one who's actually carrying out the changes), it'll be dropped to half damage or so.

While Govedo's suggestion does make people choose a more specialised role, I believe there should still be the reduced-in-effectiveness middle ground. Primaries become the "jack of all trades, master of none" in between Cerbs as the choice against bigger ships and the Pulse/Razor set up as the most effective against snubs (for those with the aim). Otherwise those who aren't good at sniping (and will struggle against them with Cerbs) will have no real defence against snubs - which is supposed to be their main role.

Kingdom of Bretonia
Colonial Republic
Independent Miners Guild
Ex-Admin

Reply

Messages In This Thread

GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-15-2012, 05:17 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Stealthsultn - 12-15-2012, 05:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ichiru - 12-15-2012, 05:45 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ascalon - 12-15-2012, 05:56 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 06:01 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-15-2012, 10:30 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by bloogaL - 12-15-2012, 10:38 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:02 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by aerelm - 12-18-2012, 12:27 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by jonfreelanc - 12-15-2012, 06:38 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JayDee Kasane - 12-15-2012, 06:47 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-15-2012, 07:23 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-15-2012, 07:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 11:10 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-15-2012, 11:18 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:21 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Giorgio - 12-15-2012, 11:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 11:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jack_Henderson - 12-15-2012, 11:45 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:57 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 12:07 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Vrabcek - 12-15-2012, 01:42 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jansen - 12-15-2012, 03:17 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by TonyRistar - 12-15-2012, 03:44 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-15-2012, 05:04 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Knjaz - 12-15-2012, 06:16 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 12-15-2012, 03:47 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Pavel - 12-15-2012, 04:14 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Vrabcek - 12-15-2012, 04:26 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Charos - 12-15-2012, 04:17 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Pavel - 12-15-2012, 06:33 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Sava - 12-15-2012, 07:25 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Blodo - 12-15-2012, 07:37 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jansen - 12-17-2012, 09:43 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-17-2012, 10:30 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Redon - 12-15-2012, 09:47 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Govedo13 - 12-16-2012, 02:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by TonyRistar - 12-16-2012, 05:14 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-16-2012, 06:17 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 12-16-2012, 06:32 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-17-2012, 06:35 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-17-2012, 10:35 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JIVA - 12-17-2012, 10:41 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-17-2012, 10:52 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JIVA - 12-17-2012, 10:56 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-18-2012, 01:43 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 12:03 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Stealthsultn - 12-18-2012, 12:10 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Omicron - 12-18-2012, 12:56 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-18-2012, 02:25 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-18-2012, 04:43 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Knjaz - 12-18-2012, 11:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by monmarfori - 01-02-2013, 05:13 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 01-02-2013, 06:14 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Tabris - 01-02-2013, 06:26 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jack_Henderson - 01-02-2013, 09:56 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Zynth - 01-02-2013, 10:33 AM

Users browsing this thread:

2 Guest(s)